Jansen Lina, Behrens Gundula, Finke Isabelle, Maier Werner, Gerken Michael, Pritzkuleit Ron, Holleczek Bernd, Brenner Hermann
Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Front Oncol. 2020 May 29;10:857. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00857. eCollection 2020.
Socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer survival have been observed in many countries. To overcome these inequalities, the underlying reasons must be disclosed. Using data from three population-based clinical cancer registries in Germany, we investigated whether associations between area-based socioeconomic deprivation and survival after colorectal cancer depended on patient-, tumor- or treatment-related factors. Patients with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer in 2000-2015 were assigned to one of five deprivation groups according to the municipality of the place of residence using the German Index of Multiple Deprivation. Cox proportional hazards regression models with various levels of adjustment and stratifications were applied. Among 38,130 patients, overall 5-year survival was 4.8% units lower in the most compared to the least deprived areas. Survival disparities were strongest in younger patients, in rectal cancer patients, in stage I cancer, in the latest period, and with longer follow-up. Disparities persisted after adjustment for stage, utilization of surgery and screening colonoscopy uptake rates. They were mostly still present when restricting to patients receiving treatment according to guidelines. We observed socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer survival in Germany. Further studies accounting for potential differences in non-cancer mortality and exploring treatment patterns in detail are needed.
在许多国家都观察到了结直肠癌生存率方面的社会经济不平等现象。为了克服这些不平等,必须揭示其潜在原因。利用德国三个基于人群的临床癌症登记处的数据,我们调查了基于地区的社会经济贫困与结直肠癌患者生存之间的关联是否取决于患者、肿瘤或治疗相关因素。根据德国多重贫困指数,将2000年至2015年诊断为结直肠癌的患者按照居住地所在市分配到五个贫困组之一。应用了具有不同调整水平和分层的Cox比例风险回归模型。在38130名患者中,与最不贫困地区相比,最贫困地区的总体5年生存率低4.8个百分点。生存差异在年轻患者、直肠癌患者、I期癌症患者、最近时期以及随访时间较长的患者中最为明显。在对分期、手术利用率和筛查结肠镜检查接受率进行调整后,差异仍然存在。当仅限于按照指南接受治疗的患者时,差异大多仍然存在。我们在德国观察到了结直肠癌生存率方面的社会经济不平等现象。需要进一步的研究来考虑非癌症死亡率的潜在差异并详细探索治疗模式。