Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Alcohol. 2014 Jun;48(4):337-44. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
Instrumental behavior can shift from flexible, goal-directed actions to automatic, stimulus-response actions. The satiety-specific devaluation test assesses behavioral flexibility by evaluating reward seeking after temporary devaluation of the reinforcer via satiety; a decrease in responding compared to control conditions indicates goal-directed behavior. We have observed variability in the outcome of this test that may be dependent on the reinforcer. Another test of habit, contingency degradation, involves changing the action-outcome association over the course of retraining and determines whether reward seeking is sensitive to changing contingencies. We hypothesized that the outcome of the contingency-degradation test would remain consistent across reinforcers, while the satiety-specific devaluation test may vary across reinforcers because it depends on the ability of the reinforcer to induce satiety. Therefore, we trained rats to self-administer 1.5% sucrose, 10% sucrose, 10% ethanol, or 10 mM monosodium glutamate (MSG) on a fixed-ratio (FR5) schedule that has been shown to promote long-term, goal-directed responding. Next, behavioral flexibility was evaluated in three satiety-specific devaluation tests over 6 weeks. Finally, we investigated reward seeking after contingency-degradation training. All groups displayed sensitivity to satiety-specific devaluation in the first test, indicating goal-directed behavior. While the 10% sucrose and ethanol groups remained goal-directed, the 1.5% sucrose and MSG groups exhibited habit-like behavior in later tests. Nevertheless, all groups displayed decreased responding in an extinction session after contingency-degradation training, indicating goal-directed behavior. These results demonstrate that tests of behavioral flexibility can yield dissimilar results in the same rats. Next, rats from the 1.5% sucrose group underwent the entire experiment again, now self-administering 10% sucrose. These rats showed pronounced goal-directed behavior in satiety-specific and contingency-degradation tests under 10% sucrose conditions, further suggesting that the reinforcer solution affected the outcome of the satiety-specific devaluation test. We conclude that reinforcer characteristics should be considered when investigating habit-like behavior in alcohol research.
工具性行为可以从灵活的、有目标导向的行为转变为自动的、刺激-反应行为。饱食特异性贬值测试通过评估强化物通过饱食暂时贬值后的奖励寻求来评估行为灵活性;与对照条件相比,反应减少表明存在目标导向行为。我们观察到该测试的结果存在变异性,这种变异性可能取决于强化物。另一种习惯测试,即关联退化,涉及在重新训练过程中改变行为-结果关联,并确定奖励寻求是否对变化的关联敏感。我们假设,关联退化测试的结果在不同的强化物之间保持一致,而饱食特异性贬值测试可能因强化物而异,因为它取决于强化物诱导饱食的能力。因此,我们训练大鼠在固定比率(FR5)方案下自我给予 1.5%蔗糖、10%蔗糖、10%乙醇或 10 mM 单谷氨酸钠(MSG),该方案已被证明可促进长期、有目标导向的反应。接下来,我们在 6 周内进行了三项饱食特异性贬值测试,以评估行为灵活性。最后,我们研究了关联退化训练后的奖励寻求。所有组在第一次测试中均对饱食特异性贬值敏感,表明存在目标导向行为。虽然 10%蔗糖和乙醇组保持目标导向,但 1.5%蔗糖和 MSG 组在后续测试中表现出类似习惯的行为。尽管如此,所有组在关联退化训练后的消退阶段反应均减少,表明存在目标导向行为。这些结果表明,行为灵活性测试在同一只大鼠中可能会产生不同的结果。接下来,1.5%蔗糖组的大鼠再次进行了整个实验,现在自我给予 10%蔗糖。这些大鼠在 10%蔗糖条件下的饱食特异性和关联退化测试中表现出明显的目标导向行为,进一步表明强化物溶液影响了饱食特异性贬值测试的结果。我们得出结论,在酒精研究中研究类似习惯的行为时,应考虑强化物的特征。