Korn S J, Horn R
Neurosciences Department, Roche Institute of Molecular Biology, Nutley, New Jersey 07110.
Biophys J. 1988 Nov;54(5):871-7. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83023-6.
A statistical comparison is presented of Markov and fractal models of ion channel gating. The analysis is based on single-channel data from two types of ion channels: open times from a 90 pS Ca-activated K channel from GH3 pituitary cells, and closed times from a nonselective channel from rabbit corneal endothelium (Liebovitch et al., 1987a). Maximum likelihood methods were used to fit the data. For both data sets the best Markov model had three exponential components. The best Markov model had a higher likelihood than the fractal model, and the Asymptotic Information Criterion favored the Markov model for each data set. A more detailed analysis, using the Monte Carlo methods described in Horn (1987), showed that the Markov model was not significantly better than the fractal model for the corneal endothelium channels. The inability to discriminate the models definitively in this case was shown to be due in part to the small size of the data set.
本文对离子通道门控的马尔可夫模型和分形模型进行了统计比较。分析基于来自两种类型离子通道的单通道数据:GH3垂体细胞中90 pS钙激活钾通道的开放时间,以及兔角膜内皮非选择性通道的关闭时间(Liebovitch等人,1987a)。使用最大似然法对数据进行拟合。对于这两个数据集,最佳马尔可夫模型有三个指数成分。最佳马尔可夫模型比分形模型具有更高的似然性,并且渐近信息准则对每个数据集都支持马尔可夫模型。使用Horn(1987)中描述的蒙特卡罗方法进行的更详细分析表明,对于角膜内皮通道,马尔可夫模型并不比分形模型显著更好。在这种情况下无法明确区分模型,部分原因是数据集规模较小。