Sansom M S, Ball F G, Kerry C J, McGee R, Ramsey R L, Usherwood P N
Department of Zoology, University of Nottingham, University Park, United Kingdom.
Biophys J. 1989 Dec;56(6):1229-43. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82770-5.
The gating kinetics of single-ion channels are generally modeled in terms of Markov processes with relatively small numbers of channel states. More recently, fractal (Liebovitch et al. 1987. Math. Biosci. 84:37-68) and diffusion (Millhauser et al. 1988. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85:1502-1507) models of channel gating have been proposed. These models propose the existence of many similar conformational substrates of the channel protein, all of which contribute to the observed gating kinetics. It is important to determine whether or not Markov models provide the most accurate description of channel kinetics if progress is to be made in understanding the molecular events of channel gating. In this study six alternative classes of gating model are tested against experimental single-channel data. The single-channel data employed are from (a) delayed rectifier K+ channels of NG 108-15 cells and (b) locust muscle glutamate receptor channels. The models tested are (a) Markov, (b) fractal, (c) one-dimensional diffusion, (d) three-dimensional diffusion, (e) stretched exponential, and (f) expo-exponential. The models are compared by fitting the predicted distributions of channel open and closed times to those observed experimentally. The models are ranked in order of goodness-of-fit using a boot-strap resampling procedure. The results suggest that Markov models provide a markedly better description of the observed open and closed time distributions for both types of channel. This provides justification for the continued use of Markov models to explore channel gating mechanisms.
单离子通道的门控动力学通常根据具有相对较少通道状态的马尔可夫过程进行建模。最近,已经提出了通道门控的分形模型(利博维奇等人,1987年。数学生物科学。84:37 - 68)和扩散模型(米尔豪泽等人,1988年。美国国家科学院院刊。85:1502 - 1507)。这些模型提出通道蛋白存在许多相似的构象底物,所有这些底物都对观察到的门控动力学有贡献。如果要在理解通道门控的分子事件方面取得进展,确定马尔可夫模型是否提供了对通道动力学最准确的描述就很重要。在本研究中,针对实验单通道数据测试了六类替代的门控模型。所采用的单通道数据来自(a)NG 108 - 15细胞的延迟整流钾通道和(b)蝗虫肌肉谷氨酸受体通道。测试的模型有(a)马尔可夫模型,(b)分形模型,(c)一维扩散模型,(d)三维扩散模型,(e)拉伸指数模型,以及(f)指数 - 指数模型。通过将通道开放和关闭时间的预测分布与实验观察到的分布进行拟合来比较这些模型。使用自举重采样程序按拟合优度对模型进行排序。结果表明,马尔可夫模型对这两种类型通道观察到的开放和关闭时间分布提供了明显更好的描述。这为继续使用马尔可夫模型来探索通道门控机制提供了依据。