Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查后脾损伤的表现与处理:一项系统综述

Presentation and management of splenic injury after colonoscopy: a systematic review.

作者信息

Piccolo Gaetano, Di Vita Maria, Cavallaro Andrea, Zanghì Antonio, Lo Menzo Emanuele, Cardì Francesco, Cappellani Alessandro

机构信息

*Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy †Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Boulevard, Weston, FL.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Apr;24(2):95-102. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182a83493.

Abstract

This study reviewed all single experience of splenic injuries after colonoscopy in the last 40 years to define the possible risk factors and the management of this complication. A MEDLINE and a PubMed search was undertaken to identify articles in English, French, Spanish, and Italian from 1974 to 2012 using the key words: "splenic injury," "splenic rupture," and "colonoscopy." Data were analyzed using descriptive statistic. A total of 103 cases have been described in 75 reports. The majority of the patients were women (71.56%) and 6.85% underwent previous pelvic surgery. The mean age was 63 years (range, 29 to 90 y). About 61 of the 103 studies (59.2%) reported the presence or the absence of previous abdominal surgery and within these, only 31 of 61 patients (50.82%) underwent previous abdominal surgery. In this review, over half of the patients with splenic injury underwent colonoscopy for routine surveillance (62.75%), and only one third of the splenic injures were associated with biopsy or polypectomy. The majority of patients (78.57%) developed symptoms within the first 24 hours after colonoscopy and in a minority of cases (21.43%), there was a delayed presentation 24 hours after colonoscopy. Computed tomography was used as the primary modality to make the diagnosis in 69 of 98 cases (70.41%) and as a confirmatory test in many additional cases. Twenty-six of 102 patients (25.49%) were treated by conservative methods, whereas the majority of patients (69.61%) underwent splenectomy as a definitive treatment. Because of possible medicolegal implications, the endoscopists should consider mentioning splenic injury on the consent form of colonoscopy after bowel perforation and bleeding, particularly in higher risk patients.

摘要

本研究回顾了过去40年中结肠镜检查后脾脏损伤的所有单一病例经验,以确定可能的危险因素及该并发症的处理方法。利用关键词“脾脏损伤”“脾破裂”和“结肠镜检查”,在MEDLINE和PubMed数据库中进行检索,以识别1974年至2012年期间的英文、法文、西班牙文和意大利文文章。采用描述性统计方法对数据进行分析。75篇报告中共描述了103例病例。大多数患者为女性(71.56%),6.85%的患者曾接受过盆腔手术。平均年龄为63岁(范围29至90岁)。103项研究中有61项(59.2%)报告了患者是否曾接受过腹部手术,其中61例患者中只有31例(50.82%)曾接受过腹部手术。在本综述中,超过一半的脾脏损伤患者接受结肠镜检查是为了进行常规监测(62.75%),只有三分之一的脾脏损伤与活检或息肉切除术有关。大多数患者(78.57%)在结肠镜检查后24小时内出现症状,少数病例(21.43%)在结肠镜检查24小时后出现延迟症状。在98例病例中有69例(70.41%)将计算机断层扫描作为诊断的主要手段,在许多其他病例中作为确诊检查。102例患者中有26例(25.49%)采用保守方法治疗,而大多数患者(69.61%)接受脾切除术作为最终治疗方法。由于可能涉及医疗法律问题,内镜医师应考虑在结肠镜检查同意书中提及肠道穿孔和出血后发生脾脏损伤的情况,尤其是在高危患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验