Brandt Angela J, del Pino Gaston A, Burns Jean H
Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University.
Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University;
J Vis Exp. 2014 Mar 13(85):51580. doi: 10.3791/51580.
Coexistence theory has often treated environmental heterogeneity as being independent of the community composition; however biotic feedbacks such as plant-soil feedbacks (PSF) have large effects on plant performance, and create environmental heterogeneity that depends on the community composition. Understanding the importance of PSF for plant community assembly necessitates understanding of the role of heterogeneity in PSF, in addition to mean PSF effects. Here, we describe a protocol for manipulating plant-induced soil heterogeneity. Two example experiments are presented: (1) a field experiment with a 6-patch grid of soils to measure plant population responses and (2) a greenhouse experiment with 2-patch soils to measure individual plant responses. Soils can be collected from the zone of root influence (soils from the rhizosphere and directly adjacent to the rhizosphere) of plants in the field from conspecific and heterospecific plant species. Replicate collections are used to avoid pseudoreplicating soil samples. These soils are then placed into separate patches for heterogeneous treatments or mixed for a homogenized treatment. Care should be taken to ensure that heterogeneous and homogenized treatments experience the same degree of soil disturbance. Plants can then be placed in these soil treatments to determine the effect of plant-induced soil heterogeneity on plant performance. We demonstrate that plant-induced heterogeneity results in different outcomes than predicted by traditional coexistence models, perhaps because of the dynamic nature of these feedbacks. Theory that incorporates environmental heterogeneity influenced by the assembling community and additional empirical work is needed to determine when heterogeneity intrinsic to the assembling community will result in different assembly outcomes compared with heterogeneity extrinsic to the community composition.
共存理论常常将环境异质性视为独立于群落组成;然而,诸如植物 - 土壤反馈(PSF)等生物反馈对植物表现有很大影响,并产生依赖于群落组成的环境异质性。要理解PSF对植物群落组装的重要性,除了平均PSF效应外,还需要了解异质性在PSF中的作用。在这里,我们描述了一种操纵植物诱导土壤异质性的方案。给出了两个示例实验:(1)一个使用6斑块土壤网格的田间实验,以测量植物种群反应;(2)一个使用2斑块土壤的温室实验,以测量个体植物反应。土壤可以从田间植物的根影响区域(根际土壤和紧邻根际的土壤)中采集,这些植物包括同种和异种植物物种。使用重复采集来避免土壤样本的伪重复。然后将这些土壤放入单独的斑块中进行异质处理,或混合进行均质处理。应注意确保异质处理和均质处理经历相同程度的土壤扰动。然后可以将植物放置在这些土壤处理中,以确定植物诱导的土壤异质性对植物表现的影响。我们证明,植物诱导的异质性导致的结果与传统共存模型预测的不同,这可能是由于这些反馈的动态性质。需要纳入受组装群落影响的环境异质性的理论以及更多的实证研究,以确定与群落组成外部的异质性相比,组装群落内在的异质性何时会导致不同的组装结果。