Heinze Johannes, Sitte M, Schindhelm A, Wright J, Joshi J
Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, Biodiversity Research/Botany, University of Potsdam, Maulbeerallee 1, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.
Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Altensteinstrasse 6, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Oecologia. 2016 Jun;181(2):559-69. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3591-8. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
Interactions between plants and soil microorganisms influence individual plant performance and thus plant-community composition. Most studies on such plant-soil feedbacks (PSFs) have been performed under controlled greenhouse conditions, whereas no study has directly compared PSFs under greenhouse and natural field conditions. We grew three grass species that differ in local abundance in grassland communities simultaneously in the greenhouse and field on field-collected soils either previously conditioned by these species or by the general grassland community. As soils in grasslands are typically conditioned by mixes of species through the patchy and heterogeneous plant species' distributions, we additionally compared the effects of species-specific versus non-specific species conditioning on PSFs in natural and greenhouse conditions. In almost all comparisons PSFs differed between the greenhouse and field. In the greenhouse, plant growth in species-specific and non-specific soils resulted in similar effects with neutral PSFs for the most abundant species and positive PSFs for the less abundant species. In contrast, in the field all grass species tested performed best in non-specific plots, whereas species-specific PSFs were neutral for the most abundant and varied for the less abundant species. This indicates a general beneficial effect of plant diversity on PSFs in the field. Controlled greenhouse conditions might provide valuable insights on the nominal effects of soils on plants. However, the PSFs observed in greenhouse conditions may not be the determining drivers in natural plant communities where their effects may be overwhelmed by the diversity of abiotic and biotic above- and belowground interactions in the field.
植物与土壤微生物之间的相互作用会影响单株植物的表现,进而影响植物群落的组成。大多数关于这种植物 - 土壤反馈(PSF)的研究都是在可控的温室条件下进行的,而没有研究直接比较过温室和自然田间条件下的PSF。我们在温室和田间,使用田间采集的土壤,同时种植了三种在草地群落中本地丰度不同的草种,这些土壤要么之前由这些草种处理过,要么由一般的草地群落处理过。由于草地中的土壤通常是通过斑块状和异质的植物物种分布,由物种混合处理的,我们还比较了物种特异性与非特异性物种处理对自然和温室条件下PSF的影响。在几乎所有的比较中,温室和田间的PSF都有所不同。在温室中,在物种特异性和非特异性土壤中植物生长产生了相似的效果,对于最丰富的物种,PSF呈中性,对于较不丰富的物种,PSF呈阳性。相比之下,在田间,所有测试的草种在非特异性地块中表现最佳,而对于最丰富的物种,物种特异性PSF呈中性,对于较不丰富的物种则有所不同。这表明植物多样性对田间的PSF具有普遍的有益影响。可控的温室条件可能会为土壤对植物的名义影响提供有价值的见解。然而,在温室条件下观察到的PSF可能不是自然植物群落中的决定性驱动因素,在自然植物群落中,它们的影响可能会被田间非生物和生物地上与地下相互作用的多样性所掩盖。