Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5020, USA.
Ecol Lett. 2011 Oct;14(10):973-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01663.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
The concept of alternative stable states has long been a dominant framework for studying the influence of historical contingency in community assembly. This concept focuses on stable states, yet many real communities are kept in a transient state by disturbance, and the utility of predictions for stable states in explaining transient states remains unclear. Using a simple model of plant community assembly, we show that the conditions under which historical contingency affects community assembly can differ greatly for stable versus transient states. Differences arise because the contribution of such factors as mortality rate, environmental heterogeneity and plant-soil feedback to historical contingency changes as community assembly proceeds. We also show that transient states can last for a long time relative to immigration rate and generation time. These results argue for a conceptual shift of focus from alternative stable states to alternative transient states for understanding historical contingency in community assembly.
长期以来,替代稳定状态的概念一直是研究群落组装中历史偶然性影响的主导框架。这个概念侧重于稳定状态,但许多真实的群落由于干扰而处于瞬态,并且对于稳定状态的预测在解释瞬态方面的效用尚不清楚。使用一个简单的植物群落组装模型,我们表明,历史偶然性影响群落组装的条件在稳定状态与瞬态之间可能有很大差异。差异的产生是因为随着群落组装的进行,死亡率、环境异质性和植物-土壤反馈等因素对历史偶然性的贡献会发生变化。我们还表明,相对于移民率和世代时间,瞬态可以持续很长时间。这些结果表明,为了理解群落组装中的历史偶然性,需要从替代稳定状态向替代瞬态状态的概念转变。