LPNC, Université Grenoble Alpes Grenoble, France ; CNRS, LPNC UMR 5105 Grenoble, France ; ESPE, Centre de Neurosciences Cognitives, UMR 5229, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 Bron, France.
LPNC, Université Grenoble Alpes Grenoble, France ; CNRS, LPNC UMR 5105 Grenoble, France.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 20;8:150. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00150. eCollection 2014.
The way new spatial information is encoded seems to be crucial in disentangling the role of decisive regions within the spatial memory network (i.e., hippocampus, parahippocampal, parietal, retrosplenial,…). Several data sources converge to suggest that the hippocampus is not always involved or indeed necessary for allocentric processing. Hippocampal involvement in spatial coding could reflect the integration of new information generated by "online" self-related changes. In this fMRI study, the participants started by encoding several object locations in a virtual reality environment and then performed a pointing task. Allocentric encoding was maximized by using a survey perspective and an object-to-object pointing task. Two egocentric encoding conditions were used, involving self-related changes processed under a first-person perspective and implicating a self-to-object pointing task. The Egocentric-updating condition involved navigation whereas the Egocentric with rotation only condition involved orientation changes only. Conjunction analysis of spatial encoding conditions revealed a wide activation of the occipito-parieto-frontal network and several medio-temporal structures. Interestingly, only the cuneal areas were significantly more recruited by the allocentric encoding in comparison to other spatial conditions. Moreover, the enhancement of hippocampal activation was found during Egocentric-updating encoding whereas the retrosplenial activation was observed during the Egocentric with rotation only condition. Hence, in some circumstances, hippocampal and retrosplenial structures-known for being involved in allocentric environmental coding-demonstrate preferential involvement in the egocentric coding of space. These results indicate that the raw differentiation between allocentric versus egocentric representation seems to no longer be sufficient in understanding the complexity of the mechanisms involved during spatial encoding.
新的空间信息的编码方式似乎是解开空间记忆网络中决定性区域作用的关键(即海马体、旁海马体、顶叶、后穹窿等)。有几个数据源表明,海马体并不总是参与或实际上是进行无参照处理所必需的。海马体在空间编码中的参与可能反映了“在线”自我相关变化所产生的新信息的整合。在这项 fMRI 研究中,参与者首先在虚拟现实环境中编码几个物体位置,然后进行指向任务。通过使用全景视角和物体到物体的指向任务,最大限度地进行无参照编码。使用两种自我参照编码条件,涉及在第一人称视角下处理的自我相关变化,并涉及自我到物体的指向任务。自我更新条件涉及导航,而只有自我旋转条件涉及仅方向变化。空间编码条件的联合分析揭示了枕顶额网络和几个中颞结构的广泛激活。有趣的是,与其他空间条件相比,只有楔前区在无参照编码中被显著更多地招募。此外,在自我更新编码期间发现海马体激活增强,而在后穹窿仅旋转条件下观察到后穹窿激活。因此,在某些情况下,已知参与无参照环境编码的海马体和后穹窿结构在空间的自我参照编码中表现出优先参与。这些结果表明,在理解空间编码过程中涉及的机制的复杂性时,无参照与自我参照之间的原始区别似乎不再足够。