Suppr超能文献

用于腭裂闭合的牵引成骨:有限元分析。

Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure: A finite element analysis.

作者信息

Ghasemianpour Majid, Ehsani Sara, Tahmasbi Soodeh, Bayat Mohammad, Ghorbanpour Maedeh, Safavi Seyed Mohammadreza, Mirhashemi Fatemeh Sadat

机构信息

Dental Research center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Orthodontics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Jan;11(1):92-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current methods of closure of the cleft palate result in the formation of scars and impairment of growth. Distraction osteogenesis (DO) might be an effective means to repair or at least reduce the size of wide clefts. This study investigates the biomechanical aspects of this process.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DO simulation was applied to reduce the size of a unilateral hard palate cleft on a three-dimensional (3D) model of the maxilla. For the position of osteotomy lines, two different models were assumed, with the osteotomy line on the affected side in model A and on the intact side in model B. In each model, DO screws were placed on two different positions, anteriorly (models A1 and B1) and posteriorly (models A2 and B2). Displacement pattern of the bony island in each of the four models, reaction forces at DO locations, and von Mises stress were estimated. Mesh generation and data processing were carried out in the 3D finite element analysis package (ABAQUS V6.7-1; Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA).

RESULTS

In model B2, the island moved almost evenly, assuring a more complete closure of the cleft. The most uniform stress distribution was found in model B1.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the best positions for the DO screw and the osteotomy line for closure of the cleft palate are posteriorly and on the intact side, respectively.

摘要

背景

目前腭裂修复方法会导致瘢痕形成和生长障碍。牵张成骨术(DO)可能是修复或至少减小宽大腭裂尺寸的有效方法。本研究探讨该过程的生物力学方面。

材料与方法

在三维(3D)上颌骨模型上应用DO模拟来减小单侧硬腭裂的尺寸。对于截骨线位置,假设了两种不同模型,模型A中截骨线位于患侧,模型B中截骨线位于健侧。在每个模型中,DO螺钉放置在两个不同位置,前方(模型A1和B1)和后方(模型A2和B2)。估计了四个模型中每个模型的骨岛位移模式、DO位置处的反作用力和冯·米塞斯应力。在3D有限元分析软件包(ABAQUS V6.7 - 1;美国罗德岛州普罗维登斯市Simulia公司)中进行网格生成和数据处理。

结果

在模型B2中,骨岛移动几乎均匀,确保腭裂更完全闭合。在模型B1中发现应力分布最均匀。

结论

结果表明,用于腭裂闭合的DO螺钉和截骨线的最佳位置分别是后方和健侧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8b/3955322/c369b9a8ad65/DRJ-11-92-g001.jpg

相似文献

3
Sutural expansion osteogenesis for management of the bony-tissue defect in cleft palate repair: experimental studies in dogs.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 May;105(6):2012-25; discussion 2026-7. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200005000-00016.
4
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 10;8(8):CD010403. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010403.pub3.
8
Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure in a canine model.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec;7(6):398-404. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.7.6.398.

引用本文的文献

1
3D Printed Models of Cleft Palate Pathology for Surgical Education.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Sep 27;4(9):e1029. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001029. eCollection 2016 Sep.
2
Biomechanical effects of maxillary expansion on a patient with cleft palate: A finite element analysis.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Aug;150(2):313-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.029.

本文引用的文献

1
Alveolar cleft closure by osseodistraction: pitfalls and troubleshooting.
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Mar;23(2):e72-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824685d3.
2
Biomechanical response of the maxillofacial skeleton to transpalatal orthopedic force in a unilateral palatal cleft.
Angle Orthod. 2011 May;81(3):503-9. doi: 10.2319/070110-367.1. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
3
Biomechanical analysis of rapid maxillary expansion in the UCLP patient.
Med Eng Phys. 2009 Apr;31(3):409-17. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.06.011. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
4
A new approach to repairing cleft palate and acquired palatal defects with distraction osteogenesis.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Aug;35(8):718-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.010. Epub 2006 May 9.
5
Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure in a canine model.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec;7(6):398-404. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.7.6.398.
6
Segment distraction to reduce a wide alveolar cleft before alveolar bone grafting.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003 Nov;40(6):561-5. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_2003_040_0561_sdtraw_2.0.co_2.
7
Mandibular distraction in neonates: a strategy to avoid tracheostomy.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Mar;109(3):896-904; discussion 905-6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200203000-00011.
8
Incidence of cleft palate fistula: an institutional experience with two-stage palatal repair.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Nov;108(6):1515-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200111000-00011.
10
Sutural expansion osteogenesis for management of the bony-tissue defect in cleft palate repair: experimental studies in dogs.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 May;105(6):2012-25; discussion 2026-7. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200005000-00016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验