Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America; Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, United States of America; Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Department of Internal Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS Med. 2014 Apr 1;11(4):e1001624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001624. eCollection 2014 Apr.
Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has level I evidence among patients with hepatitis B but only level II evidence in patients with cirrhosis. This lack of randomized data has spurred questions regarding the utility of HCC surveillance in this patient population; however, lack of randomized data does not equate to a lack of data supporting the efficacy of surveillance. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of HCC surveillance on early stage tumor detection, receipt of curative therapy, and overall survival in patients with cirrhosis.
We performed a systematic literature review using Medline from January 1990 through January 2014 and a search of national meeting abstracts from 2009-2012. Two investigators identified studies that reported rates of early stage tumor detection, curative treatment receipt, or survival, stratified by HCC surveillance status, among patients with cirrhosis. Both investigators independently extracted data on patient populations, study methods, and results using standardized forms. Pooled odds ratios, according to HCC surveillance status, were calculated for each outcome using the DerSimonian and Laird method for a random effects model. We identified 47 studies with 15,158 patients, of whom 6,284 (41.4%) had HCC detected by surveillance. HCC surveillance was associated with improved early stage detection (odds ratio [OR] 2.08, 95% CI 1.80-2.37) and curative treatment rates (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.99-2.52). HCC surveillance was associated with significantly prolonged survival (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.67-2.17), which remained significant in the subset of studies adjusting for lead-time bias. Limitations of current data included many studies having insufficient duration of follow-up to assess survival and the majority not adjusting for liver function or lead-time bias.
HCC surveillance is associated with significant improvements in early tumor detection, receipt of curative therapy, and overall survival in patients with cirrhosis. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
乙型肝炎患者的肝癌(HCC)监测具有 I 级证据,但肝硬化患者的监测仅有 II 级证据。这种缺乏随机数据的情况引发了人们对该患者人群中 HCC 监测的实用性的质疑;然而,缺乏随机数据并不等同于缺乏支持监测疗效的数据。我们的研究目的是确定 HCC 监测对肝硬化患者早期肿瘤检测、接受根治性治疗和总体生存的影响。
我们使用 Medline 从 1990 年 1 月至 2014 年 1 月进行了系统文献回顾,并搜索了 2009-2012 年的国家会议摘要。两名调查人员确定了报告了肝硬化患者 HCC 监测状态分层后的早期肿瘤检测、根治性治疗接受率或生存率的研究。两名调查人员均使用标准化表格独立提取了患者人群、研究方法和结果的数据。使用 DerSimonian 和 Laird 法对随机效应模型中的每个结果根据 HCC 监测状态计算汇总优势比(OR)。我们确定了 47 项研究,共 15158 例患者,其中 6284 例(41.4%)通过监测发现 HCC。HCC 监测与早期检测的改善有关(OR 2.08,95%CI 1.80-2.37)和根治性治疗率(OR 2.24,95%CI 1.99-2.52)。HCC 监测与显著延长的生存相关(OR 1.90,95%CI 1.67-2.17),在调整领先时间偏差的研究亚组中仍然显著。当前数据的局限性包括许多研究随访时间不足以评估生存,且大多数研究未调整肝功能或领先时间偏差。
HCC 监测与肝硬化患者的早期肿瘤检测、根治性治疗的接受率和总体生存率的显著提高有关。请在文章后面查看编辑摘要。