文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

[慢性下腰痛的治疗评估]

[Evaluation of treatment for chronic low back pain].

作者信息

Cheng Jiwei, Wang Hongwei, Zheng Wenjie, Li Changqing, Zhou Yue

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;28(1):119-22.


DOI:
PMID:24693793
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the present clinical evaluation of treatment for chronic low back pain. METHODS: The literature on the effectiveness evaluation method of chronic low back pain was reviewed and summarized. RESULTS: Many scoring systems are used to assess the treatment for chronic low back pain through the evaluation of pain and functional disability. The function evaluations are divided into general and disease-specific evaluations. Currently the most widely used evaluation systems are as follows: short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RDQ), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) low back pain scoring system, Quebec back pain disability scale (QBPDS), and Macnab criteria. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and numerical rating scale (NRS) are usually used to evaluate the pain degree. CONCLUSION: There are many effectiveness evaluation methods of chronic low back pain, but there is still a lack of more comprehensive, concise, and practical evaluation method. Further studies are required to develop it.

摘要

目的:回顾慢性下腰痛治疗的当前临床评估。 方法:对慢性下腰痛有效性评估方法的文献进行回顾和总结。 结果:许多评分系统用于通过评估疼痛和功能障碍来评估慢性下腰痛的治疗。功能评估分为一般评估和疾病特异性评估。目前使用最广泛的评估系统如下:36项简短健康调查量表(SF-36)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、罗兰-莫里斯功能障碍问卷(RDQ)、日本矫形外科学会(JOA)下腰痛评分系统、魁北克腰痛残疾量表(QBPDS)和Macnab标准。视觉模拟量表(VAS)和数字评定量表(NRS)通常用于评估疼痛程度。 结论:慢性下腰痛有许多有效性评估方法,但仍缺乏更全面、简洁和实用的评估方法。需要进一步研究来开发它。

相似文献

[1]
[Evaluation of treatment for chronic low back pain].

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014-1

[2]
Measures of function in low back pain/disorders: Low Back Pain Rating Scale (LBPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE), Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ).

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011-11

[3]
The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006-6-15

[4]
Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.

Spine J. 2008

[5]
Rating scales for low back pain.

Br Med Bull. 2010-1-10

[6]
Clinically important outcomes in low back pain.

Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005-8

[7]
Responsiveness of a patient specific outcome measure compared with the Oswestry Disability Index v2.1 and Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008-10-15

[8]
Responsiveness and interpretability of the Portuguese version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale in patients with chronic low back pain.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014-3-1

[9]
Chronic low back pain patients with accompanying leg pain: the relationship between pain extent and pain intensity, disability and health status.

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013

[10]
Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003-3-15

引用本文的文献

[1]
Yoga compared to non-exercise or physical therapy exercise on pain, disability, and quality of life for patients with chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PLoS One. 2020-9-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索