Cheng Jiwei, Wang Hongwei, Zheng Wenjie, Li Changqing, Zhou Yue
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;28(1):119-22.
OBJECTIVE: To review the present clinical evaluation of treatment for chronic low back pain. METHODS: The literature on the effectiveness evaluation method of chronic low back pain was reviewed and summarized. RESULTS: Many scoring systems are used to assess the treatment for chronic low back pain through the evaluation of pain and functional disability. The function evaluations are divided into general and disease-specific evaluations. Currently the most widely used evaluation systems are as follows: short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RDQ), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) low back pain scoring system, Quebec back pain disability scale (QBPDS), and Macnab criteria. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and numerical rating scale (NRS) are usually used to evaluate the pain degree. CONCLUSION: There are many effectiveness evaluation methods of chronic low back pain, but there is still a lack of more comprehensive, concise, and practical evaluation method. Further studies are required to develop it.
目的:回顾慢性下腰痛治疗的当前临床评估。 方法:对慢性下腰痛有效性评估方法的文献进行回顾和总结。 结果:许多评分系统用于通过评估疼痛和功能障碍来评估慢性下腰痛的治疗。功能评估分为一般评估和疾病特异性评估。目前使用最广泛的评估系统如下:36项简短健康调查量表(SF-36)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、罗兰-莫里斯功能障碍问卷(RDQ)、日本矫形外科学会(JOA)下腰痛评分系统、魁北克腰痛残疾量表(QBPDS)和Macnab标准。视觉模拟量表(VAS)和数字评定量表(NRS)通常用于评估疼痛程度。 结论:慢性下腰痛有许多有效性评估方法,但仍缺乏更全面、简洁和实用的评估方法。需要进一步研究来开发它。
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014-1
Br Med Bull. 2010-1-10
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005-8