Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Biomedico University, Trigoria, Rome, Italy.
Br Med Bull. 2010;94:81-144. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldp052. Epub 2010 Jan 10.
INTRODUCTION: During the past decades several rating scales have been developed to assess the functional status of patients with low back pain. METHODS: We performed a search using the keywords 'spine' in combination with 'scoring system', 'scale', 'scores', 'outcome assessment', 'low back pain' and 'clinical evaluation'. RESULTS: Twenty-eight scoring systems are currently available for the evaluation of low back pain. Each of them evaluates low back pain using specific variables. All these scoring systems are presented. DISCUSSION: Although many scoring systems have been used to evaluate the back function, we are still far from a single outcome evaluation system that is reliable, valid and sensitive to clinically relevant changes, taken into account both patients' and physicians' perspective and is short and practical to use. CONCLUSION: Further studies are required to evaluate the reliability, validity and sensitivity of the low back pain scoring systems used in the common clinical practice.
简介:在过去的几十年中,已经开发出了几种评分量表来评估腰痛患者的功能状态。
方法:我们使用关键词“脊柱”与“评分系统”、“量表”、“评分”、“结果评估”、“腰痛”和“临床评估”进行了搜索。
结果:目前有 28 种评分系统可用于评估腰痛。它们中的每一个都使用特定的变量来评估腰痛。所有这些评分系统都被介绍了。
讨论:尽管已经使用了许多评分系统来评估背部功能,但我们离一个可靠、有效且对临床相关变化敏感的单一结果评估系统还很远,这个系统同时考虑了患者和医生的观点,并且简短实用。
结论:需要进一步研究来评估在普通临床实践中使用的腰痛评分系统的可靠性、有效性和敏感性。
Br Med Bull. 2010-1-10
Br Med Bull. 2008
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006-3-1
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005-8
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014-1
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003-6-1
Front Public Health. 2025-8-19
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2024-7
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024-8-19
Healthcare (Basel). 2024-6-3