Helo Yusuf, Rosenberg Ivan, D'Souza Derek, Macdonald Lindsay, Speller Robert, Royle Gary, Gibson Adam
Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK.
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Apr 21;59(8):1963-78. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/8/1963. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
A new potential quality assurance (QA) method is explored (including assessment of depth dose, dose linearity, dose rate linearity and beam profile) for clinical electron beams based on imaging Cerenkov light. The potential of using a standard commercial camera to image Cerenkov light generated from electrons in water for fast QA measurement of a clinical electron beam was explored and compared to ionization chamber measurements. The new method was found to be linear with dose and independent of dose rate (to within 3%). The uncorrected practical range measured in Cerenkov images was found to overestimate the actual value by 3 mm in the worst case. The field size measurements underestimated the dose at the edges by 5% without applying any correction factor. Still, the measured field size could be used to monitor relative changes in the beam profile. Finally, the beam-direction profile measurements were independent of the field size within 2%. A simulation was also performed of the deposited energy and of Cerenkov production in water using GEANT4. Monte Carlo simulation was used to predict the measured light distribution around the water phantom, to reproduce Cerenkov images and to find the relation between deposited energy and Cerenkov production. The camera was modelled as a pinhole camera in GEANT4, to attempt to reproduce Cerenkov images. Simulations of the deposited energy and the Cerenkov light production agreed with each other for a pencil beam of electrons, while for a realistic field size, Cerenkov production in the build-up region overestimated the dose by +8%.
探索了一种基于切伦科夫光成像的针对临床电子束的新型潜在质量保证(QA)方法(包括深度剂量、剂量线性、剂量率线性和射野轮廓评估)。研究了使用标准商用相机对水中电子产生的切伦科夫光进行成像以快速进行临床电子束QA测量的潜力,并与电离室测量结果进行了比较。发现该新方法与剂量呈线性关系,且与剂量率无关(误差在3%以内)。发现在切伦科夫图像中测量的未校正实际射程在最坏情况下高估实际值3毫米。在不应用任何校正因子的情况下,射野尺寸测量低估边缘剂量5%。尽管如此,测量的射野尺寸仍可用于监测射野轮廓的相对变化。最后,射束方向轮廓测量在2%的范围内与射野尺寸无关。还使用GEANT4对水中的沉积能量和切伦科夫产生进行了模拟。蒙特卡罗模拟用于预测水模体周围测量的光分布、重现切伦科夫图像并找到沉积能量与切伦科夫产生之间的关系。在GEANT4中将相机建模为针孔相机,试图重现切伦科夫图像。对于电子铅笔束,沉积能量模拟和切伦科夫光产生模拟相互吻合,而对于实际射野尺寸,建成区的切伦科夫产生高估剂量8%。