Howell Kathryn H, Kaplow Julie B, Layne Christopher M, Benson Molly A, Compas Bruce E, Katalinski Ranka, Pasalic Hafiza, Bosankic Nina, Pynoos Robert
a Department of Psychology , University of Memphis , 202 Psychology Building, Memphis , TN 38152 , USA.
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2015;28(1):88-104. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2014.910596. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
The vast majority of youth who lived through the Bosnian war were exposed to multiple traumatic events, including interpersonal violence, community destruction, and the loss of a loved one. This study examined factors that predict post-war psychological adjustment, specifically posttraumatic stress, in Bosnian adolescents.
Regression analyses evaluated theorized differential relations between three types of post-war stressors - exposure to trauma reminders, loss reminders, and intrafamilial conflict - specific coping strategies, and posttraumatic stress symptom dimensions.
We examined 555 Bosnian adolescents, aged 15-19 years, to predict their long-term posttraumatic stress reactions in the aftermath of war.
Findings indicated that post-war exposure to trauma reminders, loss reminders, and family conflict, as well as engagement and disengagement coping strategies, predicted posttraumatic stress symptoms. Secondary control engagement coping responses to all three types of post-war stressors were inversely associated with posttraumatic stress symptoms, whereas primary control engagement coping responses to family conflict were inversely associated with hyperarousal symptoms. Disengagement responses to trauma reminders and family conflict were positively associated with re-experiencing symptoms.
These findings shed light on ways in which trauma reminders, loss reminders, and family conflict may intersect with coping responses to influence adolescent postwar adjustment.
经历波斯尼亚战争的绝大多数年轻人都暴露于多种创伤性事件中,包括人际暴力、社区破坏以及亲人离世。本研究考察了预测波斯尼亚青少年战后心理调适,特别是创伤后应激反应的因素。
回归分析评估了战后三种类型的应激源(接触创伤提示物、丧失提示物和家庭内部冲突)、特定应对策略与创伤后应激症状维度之间的理论差异关系。
我们对555名年龄在15至19岁之间的波斯尼亚青少年进行了研究,以预测他们在战争后的长期创伤后应激反应。
研究结果表明,战后接触创伤提示物、丧失提示物和家庭冲突,以及采用投入和脱离应对策略,都能预测创伤后应激症状。对所有三种类型的战后应激源采用二级控制投入应对反应与创伤后应激症状呈负相关,而对家庭冲突采用一级控制投入应对反应与过度警觉症状呈负相关。对创伤提示物和家庭冲突采用脱离应对反应与重现症状呈正相关。
这些发现揭示了创伤提示物、丧失提示物和家庭冲突可能与应对反应相互作用,从而影响青少年战后调适的方式。