Suppr超能文献

患者参与药物评估是可取的,但并非基于证据:一项系统的文献综述。

Patient participation in medication reviews is desirable but not evidence-based: a systematic literature review.

作者信息

Willeboordse Floor, Hugtenburg Jacqueline G, Schellevis François G, Elders Petra J M

机构信息

Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; NIVEL, (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Dec;78(6):1201-16. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12398.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this systematic literature review is to investigate which types of patient participation in medication reviews have been practiced and what is known about the effects of patient participation within the medication review process.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed in multiple databases using an extensive selection and quality assessment procedure.

RESULTS

In total, 37 articles were included and most were assessed with a weak or moderate quality. In all studies patient participation in medication reviews was limited to the level of information giving by the patient to the professional, mainly on actual drug use. Nine studies showed limited results of effects of patient participation on the identification of drug related problems.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of patient participation are not frequently studied and poorly described in current literature. Nevertheless, involving patients can improve patients' knowledge, satisfaction and the identification of drug related problems. Patient involvement is now limited to information sharing. The profit of higher levels of patient communication and shared decision making is until now, not supported by evidence of its effectiveness.

摘要

目的

本系统文献综述的目的是调查在药物评估中实践了哪些类型的患者参与,以及关于患者参与药物评估过程的效果已知哪些情况。

方法

使用广泛的筛选和质量评估程序在多个数据库中进行系统文献综述。

结果

总共纳入37篇文章,大多数文章的质量评估为弱或中等。在所有研究中,患者参与药物评估仅限于患者向专业人员提供信息的层面,主要是关于实际用药情况。九项研究表明患者参与对识别药物相关问题的效果有限。

结论

目前文献中对患者参与的效果研究不频繁且描述不佳。然而,让患者参与可以提高患者的知识水平、满意度以及识别药物相关问题的能力。目前患者参与仅限于信息共享。迄今为止,更高水平的患者沟通和共同决策的益处尚无其有效性的证据支持。

相似文献

2
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
5
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

引用本文的文献

3
Patient medication counselling in community pharmacy: evaluation of the quality and content.
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 Dec 16;15(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00502-3.
4
Patient perceptions and experiences of medication review: qualitative study in general practice.
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Nov 22;23(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01903-8.
6
Older Adults Living in Sheltered Housing's Experiences of Involvement in Pro Re Nata Decisions. A Narrative Positioning Analysis.
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2021 Nov 22;8:23333936211056930. doi: 10.1177/23333936211056930. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
7
Patient Compliance: Fact or Fiction?
Innov Pharm. 2019 Aug 31;10(1). doi: 10.24926/iip.v10i1.1621. eCollection 2019.
8
Patient Participation in Nursing Care: Views From Ghanaian Nurses, Nursing Students, and Patients.
SAGE Open Nurs. 2019 Oct 10;5:2377960819880761. doi: 10.1177/2377960819880761. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Drug Utilization Reviews by Community Pharmacists in Japan: Identification of Potential Safety Concerns through the Brown Bag Program.
Value Health Reg Issues. 2012 May;1(1):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 May 25.
2
Postdischarge pharmacist medication reconciliation: impact on readmission rates and financial savings.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2013 Jan-Feb;53(1):78-84. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2013.11250.
4
5
The contribution of patient interviews to the identification of drug-related problems in home medication review.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012 Dec;37(6):674-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01370.x. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
7
Handling drug-related problems in rehabilitation patients: a randomized study.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2012 Apr;34(2):382-8. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9623-5. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
8
Challenges to physician-patient communication about medication use: a window into the skeptical patient's world.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:11-8. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S25971. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
9
Identifying discrepancies in electronic medical records through pharmacist medication reconciliation.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2012 Jan-Feb;52(1):59-66. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2012.10123.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验