Oilo Marit, Kvam Ketil, Gjerdet Nils R
Department of Clinical Dentistry - Biomaterials, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2014 Jun;122(3):245-50. doi: 10.1111/eos.12128. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
Comparison of fracture strength and fracture modes of different all-ceramic crown systems is not straightforward. Established methods for reliable testing of all-ceramic crowns are not currently available. Published in-vitro tests rarely simulate clinical failure modes and are therefore unsuited to distinguish between the materials. The in-vivo trials usually lack assessment of failure modes. Fractographic analyses show that clinical crowns usually fail from cracks initiating in the cervical margins, whereas in-vitro specimens fail from contact damage at the occlusal loading point. The aim of this study was to compare three all-ceramic systems using a clinically relevant test method that is able to simulate clinical failure modes. Ten incisor crowns of three types of all-ceramic systems were exposed to soft loading until fracture. The initiation and propagation of cracks in these crowns were compared with those of a reference group of crowns that failed during clinical use. All crowns fractured in a manner similar to fracture of the clinical reference crowns. The zirconia crowns fractured at statistically significantly higher loads than alumina and glass-ceramic crowns. Fracture initiation was in the core material, cervically in the approximal areas.
比较不同全瓷冠系统的断裂强度和断裂模式并非易事。目前尚无可靠测试全瓷冠的既定方法。已发表的体外测试很少模拟临床失效模式,因此不适合区分不同材料。体内试验通常缺乏对失效模式的评估。断口分析表明,临床牙冠通常从颈部边缘起始的裂纹处发生断裂,而体外标本则从咬合加载点的接触损伤处发生断裂。本研究的目的是使用一种能够模拟临床失效模式的临床相关测试方法来比较三种全瓷系统。将三种全瓷系统的十个切牙冠进行软加载直至断裂。将这些牙冠中裂纹的起始和扩展与临床使用中失败的牙冠参考组进行比较。所有牙冠的断裂方式与临床参考牙冠的断裂方式相似。氧化锆牙冠在统计学上显著高于氧化铝和玻璃陶瓷牙冠的载荷下发生断裂。断裂起始于核心材料,在邻面区域的颈部。