• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术:高龄与轻微但非重大的发病率或死亡率相关。

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: advanced age is associated with minor but not major morbidity or mortality.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.

Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jun;218(6):1187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.058. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.058
PMID:24698486
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large studies have documented the safety of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair in the general population. Even though this condition affects primarily the elderly, data on the short-term outcomes of this procedure on the oldest-old are lacking.

STUDY DESIGN

The NSQIP database was analyzed for all patients undergoing laparoscopic PEH repair in 2010 and 2011. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and 2-tailed Student's t-test were used to compare baseline characteristics, morbidity, and mortality. Binary logistic regression was used to control for confounding variables. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported when applicable.

RESULTS

A total of 2,681 patients undergoing laparoscopic PEH repair were identified. The mean (±SD) age of the cohort was 63 ± 14 years. We identified 313 patients (11.7%) aged 80 years and older. Using regression analysis, advanced age (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.7, p = 0.009), American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or 4 (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.1, p = 0.045), gastrostomy placement (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.7, p = 0.007), and significant recent weight loss (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.1, p = 0.037) were independently associated with development of overall morbidity. Mortality (1% vs 0.4%, p = 0.16) and serious morbidity (5.8% vs 3.7%, p = 0.083) were not significantly different between the older and younger groups. Minor morbidity was higher in the older group (8.3% vs 3.5%, OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6 to 3.9, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In an assessment of modern nationwide practice, laparoscopic PEH repair is performed with minimal morbidity and mortality. Elective repair in patients aged 80 years or older is not associated with significant differences in mortality or major morbidity compared with younger patients.

摘要

背景

大型研究已经证明了腹腔镜食管裂孔疝(PEH)修复术在普通人群中的安全性。尽管这种情况主要影响老年人,但缺乏关于该手术对最年长人群的短期结果的数据。

研究设计

分析了 2010 年和 2011 年接受腹腔镜 PEH 修复术的所有患者的 NSQIP 数据库。使用卡方检验、Fisher 确切检验和双尾学生 t 检验比较基线特征、发病率和死亡率。使用二元逻辑回归控制混杂变量。当适用时,报告比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

共确定了 2681 例接受腹腔镜 PEH 修复术的患者。队列的平均(±SD)年龄为 63 ± 14 岁。我们确定了 313 名(11.7%)年龄在 80 岁及以上的患者。通过回归分析,高龄(OR 1.7,95%CI 1.1 至 2.7,p = 0.009)、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级 3 或 4 级(OR 1.4,95%CI 1.0 至 2.1,p = 0.045)、胃造口术置放(OR 2.4,95%CI 1.3 至 4.7,p = 0.007)和近期显著体重减轻(OR 2.1,95%CI 1.1 至 4.1,p = 0.037)与总发病率的发展独立相关。死亡率(1%对 0.4%,p = 0.16)和严重发病率(5.8%对 3.7%,p = 0.083)在年龄较大和较小的组之间没有显著差异。年龄较大组的轻微发病率较高(8.3%对 3.5%,OR 2.5,95%CI 1.6 至 3.9,p < 0.001)。

结论

在对现代全国性实践的评估中,腹腔镜 PEH 修复术具有最小的发病率和死亡率。与年轻患者相比,80 岁或以上患者的择期修复与死亡率或主要发病率无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: advanced age is associated with minor but not major morbidity or mortality.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术:高龄与轻微但非重大的发病率或死亡率相关。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jun;218(6):1187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.058. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
2
Thirty-day outcomes of paraesophageal hernia repair using the NSQIP database: should laparoscopy be the standard of care?利用国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库分析食管旁疝修补术的30天预后:腹腔镜手术应成为标准治疗方式吗?
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Aug;219(2):229-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.030. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
3
Long-term quality of life and risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术后的长期生活质量和复发风险因素。
JAMA Surg. 2015 May;150(5):424-31. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.25.
4
Outcomes of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair in elderly and high-risk patients.老年及高危患者腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术的疗效
Surgery. 2006 Oct;140(4):491-8; discussion 498-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Sep 6.
5
Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality in Complex Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A NSQIP Analysis.复杂食管旁疝修补术中发病率和死亡率的预测因素:一项国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)分析
Am Surg. 2019 Oct 1;85(10):1189-1193.
6
The Importance of Age on Short-Term Outcomes Associated With Repair of Giant Paraesophageal Hernias.年龄对巨大食管旁疝修补术短期预后的影响
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jun;103(6):1700-1709. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.01.078. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
7
A population-based analysis of emergent versus elective paraesophageal hernia repair using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.使用全国住院患者样本对急诊与择期食管旁疝修补术进行的基于人群的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3473-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3626-3. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
8
Mesh reinforcement of paraesophageal hernia repair: Trends and outcomes from a national database.食管旁疝修补术中补片的应用:国家数据库中的趋势和结果。
Surgery. 2019 Nov;166(5):879-885. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
9
Predictive factors for morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: age, ASA score and operation type influence morbidity.腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术患者发病和死亡的预测因素:年龄、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分和手术类型影响发病率。
World J Surg. 2009 May;33(5):980-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-9958-9.
10
Emergent Surgery Does Not Independently Predict 30-Day Mortality After Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Results from the ACS NSQIP Database.急诊手术并非食管旁疝修补术后30天死亡率的独立预测因素:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库的结果
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Dec;19(12):2097-104. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2968-z. Epub 2015 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator for patients with paraoesophageal hernias undergoing robotic repair.用于接受机器人修复的食管旁疝患者的美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)手术风险计算器的验证
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11886-z.
2
Safety and Early Clinical Outcomes Following Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia in Octogenarians.八旬老人巨大食管裂孔疝修补术后的安全性及早期临床结局
World J Surg. 2025 May;49(5):1237-1245. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12569. Epub 2025 Apr 13.
3
The Role of High-Resolution Manometry Before and Following Antireflux Surgery: The Padova Consensus.
抗反流手术前后高分辨率测压法的作用:帕多瓦共识
Ann Surg. 2025 Jan 1;281(1):124-135. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006297. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
4
Percentage of intrathoracic stomach predicts operative and post-operative morbidity, persistent reflux and PPI requirement following laparoscopic hiatus hernia repair and fundoplication.胸腔内胃的比例预测了腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补和胃底折叠术后的手术和术后发病率、持续性反流和 PPI 需求。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1994-2002. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09701-0. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
5
Emergent Repair of Paraesophageal Hernias and the Argument for Elective Repair.食管旁疝的急诊修复及择期修复的依据
JSLS. 2019 Apr-Jun;23(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00015.
6
Who gets a PEG? An analysis of simultaneous PEG placement during elective laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.谁需要接受 PEG?择期腹腔镜膈疝修补术中同时进行 PEG 放置的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):686-695. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06815-w. Epub 2019 May 6.
7
Outcome of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair in octogenarians: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 360 patients.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术治疗 80 岁以上患者的疗效:基于登记数据的倾向评分匹配研究,共纳入 360 例患者。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3291-3299. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06619-4. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
8
Surgical trainee impact on bariatric surgery safety.外科受训者对减重手术安全性的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):3014-3025. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6587-0. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
9
Trainee-associated outcomes in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: propensity score analysis accounting for operative time, procedure complexity and patient comorbidity.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中与受训者相关的结果:考虑手术时间、手术复杂性和患者合并症的倾向评分分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):702-711. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5726-3. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
10
Volume and outcomes relationship in laparoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair.腹腔镜膈疝修补术中的容积与结局关系。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4224-4230. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5482-4. Epub 2017 Mar 24.