Fazio Lisa K, Bailey Drew H, Thompson Clarissa A, Siegler Robert S
Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Jul;123:53-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
We examined relations between symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude representations, between whole number and fraction representations, and between these representations and overall mathematics achievement in fifth graders. Fraction and whole number symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude understandings were measured using both magnitude comparison and number line estimation tasks. After controlling for non-mathematical cognitive proficiency, both symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude understandings were uniquely related to mathematics achievement, but the relation was much stronger for symbolic numbers. A meta-analysis of 19 published studies indicated that relations between non-symbolic numerical magnitude knowledge and mathematics achievement are present but tend to be weak, especially beyond 6 years of age.
我们研究了五年级学生中符号化和非符号化数字大小表征之间的关系、整数和分数表征之间的关系,以及这些表征与整体数学成绩之间的关系。分数和整数的符号化及非符号化数字大小理解通过大小比较和数轴估计任务来测量。在控制了非数学认知能力后,符号化和非符号化数字大小理解都与数学成绩有独特的关联,但符号化数字的这种关系要强得多。对19项已发表研究的荟萃分析表明,非符号化数字大小知识与数学成绩之间存在关联,但往往较弱,尤其是在6岁以后。