Andrási Terézia B, Medgyesi Orsolya, Dorner Elke, Kindler Christof
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Clinic, Essen, Germany -
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2016 Dec;57(6):881-887. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
Eversion endarterectomy (EEA) of the internal carotid artery requires less distal surgical exposure than conventional patch reconstruction endarterectomy. However, the technical success after EEA was tremendously contradictive especially with respect to the external carotid artery (ECA) patency rate. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of elliptical EEA on the quality and outcome of external carotid artery desobliteration.
Clinical outcome and carotid disease progression at one year were evaluated in thirty patients receiving EEA through short transverse skin incision either in general anesthesia (GA, 22 patients) or locoregional anesthesia (LRA, 8 patients).
One patient (GA group) required early revision for bleeding. There was no postoperative stroke, nerve damage or death. At one year, ipsilateral systolic peak velocity (SPV) measurements showed no disease progression in the internal (75.30±19.31; 62.88±28.51 cm/s) or in the external carotid artery (118.92±58.30; 79.00±27.15 cm/s, GA; RLA, respectively). The incidence of ipsilateral ECA stenosis >50% decreased from 64% preoperatively to 16 % at one year (P<0.001). On the contralateral side, incidence of ECA stenosis >50% increased from 27% preoperatively to 56% after one year (p=0.018). On the ipsilateral side, all patients in the RLA group had less than 50% stenosis of ECA at one year after the operation (P=0.021 vs. pre-OP), while in the GA group four patients developed 50-74% stenosis and one patient >75% stenosis of ECA (P<0.001 vs. pre-OP). These results were not significantly different between the two groups and demonstrated a total of 96.7% ECA patency at one year.
Elliptical transsection for EEA enables outstanding ECA revascularization with good patency at one year. Type of anesthesia does not affect the quality of the eversion technique.
与传统的补片重建内膜切除术相比,颈内动脉外翻内膜切除术所需的远端手术暴露较少。然而,外翻内膜切除术后的技术成功率存在极大争议,尤其是在外颈动脉(ECA)通畅率方面。本研究的目的是确定椭圆形外翻内膜切除术对外颈动脉再通质量和结果的影响。
对30例接受外翻内膜切除术的患者进行了评估,这些患者通过短横向皮肤切口,在全身麻醉(GA,22例患者)或局部区域麻醉(LRA,8例患者)下进行手术。评估了一年时的临床结果和颈动脉疾病进展情况。
1例患者(GA组)因出血需要早期翻修。没有术后中风、神经损伤或死亡病例。一年时,同侧收缩期峰值速度(SPV)测量显示颈内动脉(75.30±19.31;62.88±28.51 cm/s)或外颈动脉(GA组为118.92±58.30;LRA组为79.00±27.15 cm/s)均无疾病进展。同侧ECA狭窄>50%的发生率从术前的64%降至一年时的16%(P<0.001)。在对侧,ECA狭窄>50%的发生率从术前的27%增至一年后的56%(p=0.018)。在同侧,LRA组所有患者术后一年时ECA狭窄均小于50%(与术前相比P=0.021),而GA组有4例患者出现了50-74%的ECA狭窄,1例患者出现了>75%的ECA狭窄(与术前相比P<0.001)。两组之间这些结果无显著差异,且显示一年时ECA通畅率总计为96.7%。
用于外翻内膜切除术的椭圆形横切能够实现出色的ECA血管重建,且一年时通畅情况良好。麻醉类型不影响外翻技术的质量。