Berntsen Karen R M, Vriend Gert
CMBI, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 26-28, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2014 Apr;70(Pt 4):1037-49. doi: 10.1107/S139900471400087X. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
A study of isoleucines in protein structures solved using X-ray crystallography revealed a series of systematic trends for the two side-chain torsion angles χ1 and χ2 dependent on the resolution, secondary structure and refinement software used. The average torsion angles for the nine rotamers were similar in high-resolution structures solved using either the REFMAC, CNS or PHENIX software. However, at low resolution these programs often refine towards somewhat different χ1 and χ2 values. Small systematic differences can be observed between refinement software that uses molecular dynamics-type energy terms (for example CNS) and software that does not use these terms (for example REFMAC). Detailing the standard torsion angles used in refinement software can improve the refinement of protein structures. The target values in the molecular dynamics-type energy functions can also be improved.
一项对通过X射线晶体学解析的蛋白质结构中异亮氨酸的研究揭示,两个侧链扭转角χ1和χ2存在一系列与分辨率、二级结构以及所使用的精修软件相关的系统趋势。使用REFMAC、CNS或PHENIX软件解析的高分辨率结构中,九种旋转异构体的平均扭转角相似。然而,在低分辨率下,这些程序通常会精修至略有不同的χ1和χ2值。在使用分子动力学类型能量项的精修软件(例如CNS)和不使用这些项的软件(例如REFMAC)之间,可以观察到细微的系统差异。详细说明精修软件中使用的标准扭转角可以改善蛋白质结构的精修。分子动力学类型能量函数中的目标值也可以得到改进。