Lambert Thomas, Blessberger Hermann, Gammer Verena, Nahler Alexander, Grund Michael, Kerschner Klaus, Buchmayr Gunda, Saleh Karim, Kammler Jürgen, Steinwender Clemens
Cardiovascular Division, Linz General Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Clin Cardiol. 2014 May;37(5):307-11. doi: 10.1002/clc.22269. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
The sympathetic nervous system is an important factor in hypertension. In patients suffering from resistant hypertension, transfemoral renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) reduces office blood pressure (BP) values.
Ambulatory BP measurement (ABPM) is a better predictor than office BP of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We thus believe that ABPM should be added to the systematic evaluation and follow-up protocol when treating patients with resistant hypertension with RDN. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of RDN on mean 24-hour BP by the use of ABPM.
Patients with resistant hypertension (office systolic BP >160 mm Hg, or >150 mm Hg in patients with diabetes) have been treated with RDN. Ambulatory BP measurement was performed at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after RDN. Patients with a 24-hour systolic BP reduction of ≥5 mm Hg were classified as responders.
Of 86 patients initially enrolled in the study, 5 had to be excluded from the analysis because of <70% valid ABPM recordings. Out of the 81 studied patients, we found 49 responders (60.5%). In all patients, office BP decreased from 169.9/87.8 mm Hg to 153.5/86.3 mm Hg (P < 0.001/P = not significant [NS]) and 24-hour BP decreased from 144.3/86.0 mm Hg to 139.9/84.0 mm Hg (P = 0.025/P = NS) 6 months after RDN. In responders, office BP decreased from 169.6/90.3 mm Hg to 143.7/79.7 mm Hg (P < 0.001/P < 0.001). The ABPM levels started at 144.3/84.7 mm Hg and decreased to 138.3/81.5 mm Hg (P = 0.025/P = 0.045). In nonresponders, office BP was 150.2/84.0 mm Hg and 24-hour BP was 144.5/84.7 mm Hg at baseline; at 6 months, office BP was 168.7/96.4 mm Hg (P < 0.001/P = NS) and 24-hour BP was 142.2/81.5 mm Hg (P = NS/P = NS).
Office BP and AMBP levels can be significantly lowered by RDN in patients with resistant hypertension.
交感神经系统是高血压的一个重要因素。在顽固性高血压患者中,经股动脉肾交感神经去神经支配术(RDN)可降低诊室血压值。
动态血压监测(ABPM)比诊室血压更能预测心血管疾病的发病率和死亡率。因此,我们认为在用RDN治疗顽固性高血压患者时,应将ABPM纳入系统评估和随访方案。所以,我们通过ABPM评估了RDN对24小时平均血压的影响。
顽固性高血压患者(诊室收缩压>160 mmHg,糖尿病患者>150 mmHg)接受了RDN治疗。在基线时以及RDN治疗后3个月和6个月进行动态血压监测。24小时收缩压降低≥5 mmHg的患者被归类为反应者。
最初纳入研究的86例患者中,有5例因有效ABPM记录<70%而被排除在分析之外。在81例研究患者中,我们发现49例反应者(60.5%)。在所有患者中,RDN治疗6个月后,诊室血压从169.9/87.8 mmHg降至153.5/86.3 mmHg(P<0.001/P=无显著性差异[NS]),24小时血压从144.3/86.0 mmHg降至139.9/84.0 mmHg(P=0.025/P=NS)。在反应者中,诊室血压从169.6/90.3 mmHg降至143.7/79.7 mmHg(P<0.001/P<0.001)。ABPM水平从144.3/84.7 mmHg开始,降至138.3/81.5 mmHg(P=0.025/P=0.045)。在无反应者中,基线时诊室血压为150.2/84.0 mmHg,24小时血压为144.5/84.7 mmHg;6个月时,诊室血压为168.7/96.4 mmHg(P<0.开01/P=NS),24小时血压为142.2/81.5 mmHg(P=NS/P=NS)。
RDN可使顽固性高血压患者的诊室血压和ABPM水平显著降低。