• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们在周围血管疾病中使用脊髓刺激(SCS)的经验。

Our experience with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in peripheral vascular disease.

作者信息

Bracale G C, Selvetella L, Mirabile F

机构信息

Medical School of Naples, Department of Vascular Surgery, Italy.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Apr;12(4 Pt 2):695-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb02717.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb02717.x
PMID:2470052
Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) by epidural electrodes is being used more often in the treatment of patients with severe intractable ischemic pain. The promising clinical results and the objective increase in lower extremity blood flow (plethysmography, thelethermography, etc.), suggests that spinal cord stimulation may have an important role in the management of advanced arterial disease when other forms of treatment have failed. The selection criteria for implantation of SCS are very important. Our indications in patients with peripheral vascular disease are: 1. Peripheral vascular disease with severe, intractable symptoms that are untreatable by medical or surgical therapy. 2. Inflammatory or diabetic arterial disease resistant to medical treatment and/or sympathectomy. 3. Persistent and severe ischemic pain and/or ulcers in patients with patent grafts. 4. Patients for lumbar sympathectomy who have a high myocardial risk. Contraindications to implantation of SCS are claudication intermittent, large necrotic lesions (gangrene) and patients who have undergone prolonged narcotic therapy.

摘要

硬膜外电极脊髓刺激(SCS)在治疗严重顽固性缺血性疼痛患者中应用越来越频繁。其令人鼓舞的临床结果以及下肢血流客观增加(通过体积描记法、皮温记录法等)表明,当其他治疗方法失败时,脊髓刺激在晚期动脉疾病的管理中可能发挥重要作用。SCS植入的选择标准非常重要。我们对外周血管疾病患者的适应证为:1. 患有严重、顽固性症状且药物或手术治疗无法治愈的外周血管疾病。2. 对药物治疗和/或交感神经切除术耐药的炎性或糖尿病性动脉疾病。3. 移植血管通畅的患者出现持续且严重的缺血性疼痛和/或溃疡。4. 心肌风险高的拟行腰交感神经切除术的患者。SCS植入的禁忌证为间歇性跛行、大面积坏死性病变(坏疽)以及接受过长时间麻醉治疗的患者。

相似文献

1
Our experience with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in peripheral vascular disease.我们在周围血管疾病中使用脊髓刺激(SCS)的经验。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Apr;12(4 Pt 2):695-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb02717.x.
2
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in peripheral ischemic pain.脊髓刺激在外周缺血性疼痛中的应用
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Apr;12(4 Pt 2):698-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb02718.x.
3
Epidural spinal electrostimulatory system (ESES) in the management of diabetic foot and peripheral arteriopathies.硬膜外脊髓电刺激系统(ESES)在糖尿病足和外周动脉疾病管理中的应用
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Apr;12(4 Pt 2):705-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb02719.x.
4
Epidural spinal cord electrical stimulation in diabetic critical lower limb ischemia.硬膜外脊髓电刺激治疗糖尿病严重下肢缺血
J Diabetes Complications. 1999 Sep-Dec;13(5-6):293-9. doi: 10.1016/s1056-8727(99)00061-6.
5
Does autonomic neuropathy influence spinal cord stimulation therapy success in diabetic patients with critical lower limb ischemia?自主神经病变是否会影响严重下肢缺血的糖尿病患者脊髓刺激疗法的成功率?
Surg Neurol. 2000 Feb;53(2):182-8; discussion 188-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(99)00182-2.
6
[Stimulation of the spinal cord in peripheral vasculopathies].[外周血管病变中脊髓的刺激]
J Mal Vasc. 1989;14(1):50-1.
7
Transcutaneous oxygen pressure as predictive parameter for ulcer healing in endstage vascular patients treated with spinal cord stimulation.经皮氧分压作为脊髓刺激治疗终末期血管疾病患者溃疡愈合的预测参数。
Int Angiol. 1996 Dec;15(4):344-9.
8
Spinal cord stimulation in peripheral vascular pain.
Appl Neurophysiol. 1983;46(5-6):290-4. doi: 10.1159/000101276.
9
Spinal cord stimulation for severely ischemic limbs.脊髓刺激治疗严重缺血肢体。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Feb;12(2):273-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb02659.x.
10
Spinal cord stimulation in peripheral arterial disease. A cooperative study.外周动脉疾病中的脊髓刺激。一项合作研究。
J Neurosurg. 1986 Jan;64(1):71-80. doi: 10.3171/jns.1986.64.1.0071.