Howard Allison M, Fragaszy Dorothy M
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Am J Primatol. 2014 Sep;76(9):828-41. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22271. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
Prior studies have claimed that nonhuman primates plan their routes multiple steps in advance. However, a recent reexamination of multi-step route planning in nonhuman primates indicated that there is no evidence for planning more than one step ahead. We tested multi-step route planning in capuchin monkeys using a pointing device to "travel" to distal targets while stationary. This device enabled us to determine whether capuchins distinguish the spatial relationship between goals and themselves and spatial relationships between goals and the laser dot, allocentrically. In Experiment 1, two subjects were presented with identical food items in Near-Far (one item nearer to subject) and Equidistant (both items equidistant from subject) conditions with a laser dot visible between the items. Subjects moved the laser dot to the items using a joystick. In the Near-Far condition, one subject demonstrated a bias for items closest to self but the other subject chose efficiently. In the second experiment, subjects retrieved three food items in similar Near-Far and Equidistant arrangements. Both subjects preferred food items nearest the laser dot and showed no evidence of multi-step route planning. We conclude that these capuchins do not make choices on the basis of multi-step look ahead strategies.
先前的研究声称,非人类灵长类动物会提前多个步骤规划它们的路线。然而,最近对非人类灵长类动物多步骤路线规划的重新审视表明,没有证据支持它们能提前规划超过一个步骤。我们使用一种指向设备,让卷尾猴在静止状态下“前往”远处目标,以此测试它们的多步骤路线规划能力。这种设备使我们能够确定卷尾猴是否能以异心参照的方式,区分目标与自身之间的空间关系以及目标与激光点之间的空间关系。在实验1中,给两只受试动物呈现了在近-远(一个物品离受试动物较近)和等距(两个物品与受试动物距离相等)条件下的相同食物,物品之间有一个可见的激光点。受试动物使用操纵杆将激光点移向物品。在近-远条件下,一只受试动物表现出对最靠近自身的物品有偏好,但另一只受试动物选择得很有效率。在第二个实验中,受试动物以类似的近-远和等距排列方式取回三个食物。两只受试动物都更喜欢最靠近激光点的食物,且没有表现出多步骤路线规划的迹象。我们得出结论,这些卷尾猴不会基于多步骤前瞻策略做出选择。