Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Scarborough, ON, Canada.
Primates. 2023 Sep;64(5):495-511. doi: 10.1007/s10329-023-01070-z. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
Animals must make route choices every day when moving through their habitat while foraging. Choosing an optimal route can be cognitively costly, and primates and other animals have been shown to use simple heuristics, "rules of thumb", to make foraging route choices. We investigated the potential use of heuristics among foraging free-ranging Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) during solitary foraging trials. We also investigated the potential influence of individual variables (age and sex) and social variables (presence in the central group, presence of potential inter- and intraspecific competitors), on the use of heuristics, route length and trial time. We used a multi-destination foraging experiment with 6 platforms in a (4 m × 8 m) Z-array, completed by 29 Japanese macaques in 155 runs at the Awajishima Monkey Center in Japan. Our results showed that the macaques chose routes consistent with heuristics (e.g. nearest neighbour heuristic 19.4%, convex hull heuristic 4.5%) and selected optimal routes (shortest path in 23.9% of the trials). We also identified a potential new heuristic that was used most frequently, that we termed the "sweep heuristic" (27.1% of trials), which we interpreted as a strategy to deal with competitive foraging trade-offs - choosing routes to prioritize not leaving isolated food pieces behind. Age was significantly related to trial time; juvenile macaques were faster than adults and young adults, using speed to gain access to resources. Solitary trials with conspecifics present took significantly longer routes. Our results suggest that contextual factors led to variation in Japanese macaque decision-making, and we suggest that the preferential use of a sweep heuristic may have been a response to high intragroup competition.
动物在觅食时每天都必须在其栖息地中选择路线。选择最佳路线可能在认知上具有成本,并且已经证明灵长类动物和其他动物使用简单的启发式方法,即“经验法则”,来做出觅食路线选择。我们在单独觅食试验中研究了觅食自由放养的日本猕猴(Macaca fuscata)中启发式方法的潜在用途。我们还研究了个体变量(年龄和性别)和社会变量(在中央群体中的存在,潜在的种间和种内竞争者的存在)对启发式方法,路线长度和试验时间的潜在影响。我们在日本的和歌山猴子中心(Awajishima Monkey Center)使用了一个具有 6 个平台的多目的地觅食实验,由 29 只日本猕猴在 155 次运行中完成。我们的结果表明,猕猴选择的路线符合启发式方法(例如最近邻居启发式 19.4%,凸壳启发式 4.5%),并选择了最佳路线(23.9%的试验中选择最短路径)。我们还确定了一种可能最常用的潜在新启发式方法,我们称之为“扫荡启发式”(27.1%的试验),我们将其解释为应对竞争觅食权衡的策略-选择优先考虑不留下孤立食物的路线。年龄与试验时间显着相关;幼猴比成年和年轻成年人快,利用速度获取资源。有同种动物存在的单独试验的路线明显更长。我们的结果表明,环境因素导致日本猕猴的决策发生变化,我们建议优先使用扫荡启发式可能是对高组内竞争的反应。