• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“活力因素”——教员们如何描述最优秀的儿科住院医师?

The "zing factor"-how do faculty describe the best pediatrics residents?

作者信息

Rosenbluth Glenn, O'Brien Bridget, Asher Emily M, Cho Christine S

出版信息

J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Mar;6(1):106-11. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00146.1.

DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-13-00146.1
PMID:24701319
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3963764/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Faculty in graduate medical education programs may not have uniform approaches to differentiating the quality of residents, and reviews of evaluations suggest that faculty use different standards when assessing residents. Standards for assessing residents also do not consistently map to items on evaluation forms. One way to improve assessment is to reach consensus on the traits and behaviors that are (or should be) present in the best residents.

METHODS

A trained interviewer conducted semistructured interviews with faculty affiliated with 2 pediatrics residency programs until content saturation was achieved. Interviewees were asked to describe specific traits present in residents they identify as the best. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. We used an iterative, inductive approach to generate a coding scheme and identify common themes.

RESULTS

From 23 interviews, we identified 7 thematic categories of traits and behaviors: personality, energy, professionalism, team behaviors, self-improvement behaviors, patient-interaction behaviors, and medical knowledge and clinical skills (including a subcategory, knowledge integration). Most faculty interviewees focused on traits like passion, enthusiasm, maturity, and reliability. Examination score or intelligence was mentioned less frequently than traits and behaviors categorized under personality and professionalism.

CONCLUSIONS

Faculty identified many traits and behaviors in the residents they define as the best. The thematic categories had incomplete overlap with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and CanMEDS competencies. This research highlights the ongoing need to review our assessment strategies, and may have implications for the ACGME Milestone Project.

摘要

背景

研究生医学教育项目中的教员在区分住院医师质量方面可能没有统一的方法,对评估的审查表明,教员在评估住院医师时使用不同的标准。评估住院医师的标准也没有始终如一地映射到评估表上的项目。改进评估的一种方法是就优秀住院医师所具备(或应该具备)的特质和行为达成共识。

方法

一名经过培训的访谈者对隶属于两个儿科住院医师项目的教员进行了半结构化访谈,直至达到内容饱和。受访者被要求描述他们认为是最优秀的住院医师所具有的具体特质。访谈进行了录音和转录。我们采用迭代归纳法生成编码方案并确定共同主题。

结果

通过23次访谈,我们确定了特质和行为的7个主题类别:个性、活力、专业精神、团队行为、自我提升行为、医患互动行为以及医学知识和临床技能(包括一个子类别,知识整合)。大多数教员受访者关注的特质包括热情、积极性、成熟度和可靠性。与个性和专业精神类别下的特质和行为相比,考试成绩或智力被提及的频率较低。

结论

教员们确定了他们认为最优秀的住院医师所具有的许多特质和行为。这些主题类别与研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)和加拿大医学教育专业认证委员会(CanMEDS)的能力要求存在不完全重叠。本研究强调了持续审查我们评估策略的必要性,可能对ACGME里程碑项目产生影响。

相似文献

1
The "zing factor"-how do faculty describe the best pediatrics residents?“活力因素”——教员们如何描述最优秀的儿科住院医师?
J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Mar;6(1):106-11. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00146.1.
2
Using the ACGME Milestones for Resident Self-Evaluation and Faculty Engagement.使用美国研究生医学教育认证委员会住院医师自我评估和教员参与度的里程碑标准。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):e150-e157. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.09.001.
3
Four-Year Analysis of a Novel Milestone-Based Assessment of Faculty by General Surgical Residents.基于里程碑的普通外科住院医师对教员进行的四年分析。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Nov;75(6):e126-e133. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
4
Resident perspectives on professionalism lack common consensus.住院医师对职业道德的看法缺乏共识。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;63(1):61-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.07.493. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
5
Improving Our Ability to Predict Resident Applicant Performance: Validity Evidence for a Situational Judgment Test.提高我们预测住院医师申请人表现的能力:情境判断测验的效标证据。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Oct-Dec;32(5):508-521. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1760104. Epub 2020 May 19.
6
Personality Factors Associated With Resident Performance: Results From 12 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Accredited Orthopaedic Surgery Programs.与住院医师表现相关的人格因素:来自12个研究生医学教育认证委员会认证的骨科手术项目的结果。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Jan-Feb;75(1):122-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
7
Fostering and assessing professionalism and communication skills in neurosurgical education.在神经外科教育中培养和评估专业素养与沟通技巧。
J Surg Educ. 2014 Nov-Dec;71(6):e83-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.06.016. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
8
Correlations between Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Obstetrics and Gynecology Milestones and American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores: an initial validity study.妇产科住院医师规范化培训评估委员会里程碑与美国妇产科委员会资格考试成绩之间的相关性:初步有效性研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;224(3):308.e1-308.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.029. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
9
Improving professionalism: making the implicit more explicit.提升专业素养:让隐性的变得更加显性。
J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2287-90; discussion 2291. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.149.
10
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Core Competencies at a Community Teaching Hospital: Is There a Gap in Awareness?社区教学医院的毕业后医学教育认证委员会核心能力:认知上是否存在差距?
Perm J. 2016 Fall;20(4):16-067. doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-067. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Values-Based Resident Selection in an Internal Medicine-Pediatrics Residency Program.基于价值观的内科-儿科住院医师培训项目住院医师选拔。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(6):1410-1416. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07857-y. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
2
Identifying High-Performing Students in Inpatient Clerkships: A Qualitative Study.识别住院医师实习中的优秀学生:一项定性研究。
Med Sci Educ. 2018 Dec 17;29(1):199-204. doi: 10.1007/s40670-018-00667-0. eCollection 2019 Mar.
3
Improving Diversity in Pediatric Residency Selection: Using an Equity Framework to Implement Holistic Review.提高儿科住院医师选拔的多样性:运用公平框架实施全面评估。
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Apr;13(2):195-200. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-01024.1. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
4
Judging residents' performance: a qualitative study using grounded theory.评价住院医师绩效:基于扎根理论的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1446-1.
5
From aggregation to interpretation: how assessors judge complex data in a competency-based portfolio.从聚集到解释:评估者如何在基于能力的组合中判断复杂数据。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 May;23(2):275-287. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9793-y. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
6
Getting to best: physician development as a developmental process.追求卓越:作为一个发展过程的医师成长
J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Mar;6(1):172-3. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00443.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Seeing the same thing differently: mechanisms that contribute to assessor differences in directly-observed performance assessments.从不同角度看待相同事物:直接观察绩效评估中评估者差异的促成机制。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 Aug;18(3):325-41. doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9372-1. Epub 2012 May 12.
2
Using "standardized narratives" to explore new ways to represent faculty opinions of resident performance.运用“标准化叙述”探索新方法来展现教师对住院医师表现的看法。
Acad Med. 2012 Apr;87(4):419-27. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31824858a9.
3
Competencies "plus": the nature of written comments on internal medicine residents' evaluation forms.能力“加分项”:内科住院医师评估表中书面评语的性质。
Acad Med. 2011 Oct;86(10 Suppl):S30-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822a6d92.
4
Opening the black box of clinical skills assessment via observation: a conceptual model.通过观察打开临床技能评估的“黑箱”:一个概念模型。
Med Educ. 2011 Oct;45(10):1048-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04025.x.
5
Toward authentic clinical evaluation: pitfalls in the pursuit of competency.走向真实的临床评估:追求能力的陷阱。
Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):780-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d73fb6.
6
Collecting validity evidence for an assessment of professionalism: findings from think-aloud interviews.收集专业素养评估的效度证据:出声思考访谈的结果
Acad Med. 2008 Oct;83(10 Suppl):S9-12. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318183e329.
7
Defining successful performance among pediatric residents.界定儿科住院医师的成功表现。
Pediatrics. 1990 Feb;85(2):139-43.
8
Limitations of physician ratings in the assessment of student clinical performance in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship.在妇产科临床实习中,医师评分在评估学生临床能力方面的局限性。
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jul;78(1):136-41.