N Naveen, R Srinath
Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences , India .
Professor and HOD, Department of General Surgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences , India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Feb;8(2):88-91. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7431.4016. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
Bassini's repair and the Lichtenstein's tension free mesh hernioplasty are commonly used hernia repair techniques and yet there is no unison as to which is the best technique. Our hospital being in a rural setup and catering to majority of poor patients who are daily wagers, open hernia repairs are commonly done. This study was undertaken to compare the technique and post-operative course so as to determine the best suitable of the two procedures for them.
A comparative randomized study was conducted on a total of 70 patients with inguinal hernia and were operated upon by either of technique and followed up. Outcome of both the techniques were analyzed and compared with other similar studies.
Study involved 35 each of Modified Bassini's Repair (MBR) and Lichtenstein's Mesh Repair (LMR), over a period of 18 months. MBR took more operating time than LMR. Commonest complication in both the groups was seroma formation. There were two recurrences in the MBR group and none in LMR group.
LMR was comparatively better than MBR due to its simplicity, less dissection and early ambulation in the post-operative period and with no recurrence, in our study.
巴西尼修补术和利希滕斯坦无张力疝修补术是常用的疝修补技术,但对于哪种是最佳技术尚无统一意见。我们医院位于农村地区,服务对象大多是贫困的日薪工人,开放式疝修补术较为常见。本研究旨在比较这两种技术及其术后过程,以确定最适合他们的手术方法。
对70例腹股沟疝患者进行了一项比较随机研究,分别采用这两种技术之一进行手术并随访。分析了两种技术的结果,并与其他类似研究进行了比较。
在18个月的时间里,研究涉及35例行改良巴西尼修补术(MBR)和35例行利希滕斯坦疝修补术(LMR)的患者。MBR的手术时间比LMR长。两组最常见的并发症都是血清肿形成。MBR组有2例复发,LMR组无复发。
在我们的研究中,LMR由于其操作简单、解剖范围小、术后早期可活动且无复发,相对比MBR更好。