Suppr超能文献

农村人口腹股沟疝改良巴西尼修补术与利希滕斯坦无张力修补术(LMR)的比较研究

A Comparative Study between Modified Bassini's Repair and Lichtenstein Mesh Repair (LMR) of Inguinal Hernias in Rural Population.

作者信息

N Naveen, R Srinath

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences , India .

Professor and HOD, Department of General Surgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences , India .

出版信息

J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Feb;8(2):88-91. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7431.4016. Epub 2014 Feb 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bassini's repair and the Lichtenstein's tension free mesh hernioplasty are commonly used hernia repair techniques and yet there is no unison as to which is the best technique. Our hospital being in a rural setup and catering to majority of poor patients who are daily wagers, open hernia repairs are commonly done. This study was undertaken to compare the technique and post-operative course so as to determine the best suitable of the two procedures for them.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comparative randomized study was conducted on a total of 70 patients with inguinal hernia and were operated upon by either of technique and followed up. Outcome of both the techniques were analyzed and compared with other similar studies.

RESULTS

Study involved 35 each of Modified Bassini's Repair (MBR) and Lichtenstein's Mesh Repair (LMR), over a period of 18 months. MBR took more operating time than LMR. Commonest complication in both the groups was seroma formation. There were two recurrences in the MBR group and none in LMR group.

CONCLUSION

LMR was comparatively better than MBR due to its simplicity, less dissection and early ambulation in the post-operative period and with no recurrence, in our study.

摘要

背景

巴西尼修补术和利希滕斯坦无张力疝修补术是常用的疝修补技术,但对于哪种是最佳技术尚无统一意见。我们医院位于农村地区,服务对象大多是贫困的日薪工人,开放式疝修补术较为常见。本研究旨在比较这两种技术及其术后过程,以确定最适合他们的手术方法。

材料与方法

对70例腹股沟疝患者进行了一项比较随机研究,分别采用这两种技术之一进行手术并随访。分析了两种技术的结果,并与其他类似研究进行了比较。

结果

在18个月的时间里,研究涉及35例行改良巴西尼修补术(MBR)和35例行利希滕斯坦疝修补术(LMR)的患者。MBR的手术时间比LMR长。两组最常见的并发症都是血清肿形成。MBR组有2例复发,LMR组无复发。

结论

在我们的研究中,LMR由于其操作简单、解剖范围小、术后早期可活动且无复发,相对比MBR更好。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
3
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

3
Groin hernia repair: open techniques.腹股沟疝修补术:开放技术
World J Surg. 2005 Aug;29(8):1046-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7967-x.
4
Inguinal hernia: an old condition with new solutions.腹股沟疝:一种有新解决方案的古老病症。
Ann Surg. 2003 Dec;238(6 Suppl):S148-57. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000097796.63010.e8.
8
Complications of groin hernia surgery.腹股沟疝手术的并发症
Surg Clin North Am. 1998 Dec;78(6):1089-103. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70371-6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验