Zhang Chun-Qing, Si Gangyan, Chung Pak-Kwong, Du Mengmeng, Terry Peter C
a Department of Physical Education , Hong Kong Baptist University , Kowloon , Hong Kong.
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(15):1465-76. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.898184. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
Building on the work of Terry and colleagues (Terry, P. C., Lane, A. M., Lane, H. J., & Keohane, L. (1999). Development and validation of a mood measure for adolescents. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17, 861-872; Terry, P. C., Lane, A. M., & Fogarty, G. J. (2003). Construct validity of the Profile of Mood States-Adolescents for use with adults. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 4, 125-139.), the present study examined the validity and internal consistency reliability of the Chinese version of the Brunel Mood Scale (BRUMS-C) among 2,548 participants, comprising adolescent athletes (n = 520), adult athletes (n = 434), adolescent students (n = 673), and adult students (n = 921). Both adolescent and adult athletes completed the BRUMS-C before, during, or after regular training and both adolescent and adult students completed the BRUMS-C in a classroom setting. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) provided support for the factorial validity of a 23-item six-factor model, with one item removed from the hypothesised measurement model. Internal consistency reliabilities were satisfactory for all subscales across each of the four samples. Criterion validity was supported with strong relationships between the BRUMS-C, abbreviated POMS, and Chinese Affect Scale consistent with theoretical predictions. Multi-sample CFAs showed the BRUMS-C to be invariant at the configural, metric, strong, and structural levels for all samples. Furthermore, latent mean difference analyses showed that athletes reported significantly higher levels of fatigue than students while maintaining almost the same levels of vigour, and adolescent students reported significantly higher levels of depressed mood than the other three samples.
基于特里及其同事的研究成果（特里，P.C.，莱恩，A.M.，莱恩，H.J.，& 基奥汉，L.（1999年）。青少年情绪测量工具的开发与验证。《运动科学杂志》，17，861 - 872；特里，P.C.，莱恩，A.M.，& 福加蒂，G.J.（2003年）。用于成年人的青少年情绪状态剖面图的结构效度。《运动与锻炼心理学》，4，125 - 139），本研究在2548名参与者中检验了布鲁内尔情绪量表中文版（BRUMS - C）的效度和内部一致性信度，这些参与者包括青少年运动员（n = 520）、成年运动员（n = 434）、青少年学生（n = 673）和成年学生（n = 921）。青少年和成年运动员在常规训练前、训练期间或训练后完成BRUMS - C，青少年和成年学生均在课堂环境中完成BRUMS - C。验证性因素分析（CFA）为一个包含23个项目的六因素模型的因素效度提供了支持，从假设的测量模型中删除了一个项目。四个样本中所有子量表的内部一致性信度都令人满意。标准效度得到了支持，BRUMS - C、简化版POMS和中文情感量表之间的强关系与理论预测一致。多样本CFA表明，BRUMS - C在所有样本的构型、度量、强等效性和结构水平上都是不变的。此外，潜在均值差异分析表明，运动员报告的疲劳水平显著高于学生，而活力水平几乎相同，并且青少年学生报告的抑郁情绪水平显著高于其他三个样本。
