Wallace David J, Angus Derek C, Seymour Christopher W, Yealy Donald M, Carr Brendan G, Kurland Kristen, Boujoukos Arthur, Kahn Jeremy M
Clinical Research, Investigation and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Clinical Research, Investigation and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 4;9(4):e94057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094057. eCollection 2014.
Optimal care of adults with severe acute respiratory failure requires specific resources and expertise. We sought to measure geographic access to these centers in the United States.
Cross-sectional analysis of geographic access to high capability severe acute respiratory failure centers in the United States. We defined high capability centers using two criteria: (1) provision of adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), based on either 2008-2013 Extracorporeal Life Support Organization reporting or provision of ECMO to 2010 Medicare beneficiaries; or (2) high annual hospital mechanical ventilation volume, based 2010 Medicare claims.
Nonfederal acute care hospitals in the United States.
We defined geographic access as the percentage of the state, region and national population with either direct or hospital-transferred access within one or two hours by air or ground transport. Of 4,822 acute care hospitals, 148 hospitals met our ECMO criteria and 447 hospitals met our mechanical ventilation criteria. Geographic access varied substantially across states and regions in the United States, depending on center criteria. Without interhospital transfer, an estimated 58.5% of the national adult population had geographic access to hospitals performing ECMO and 79.0% had geographic access to hospitals performing a high annual volume of mechanical ventilation. With interhospital transfer and under ideal circumstances, an estimated 96.4% of the national adult population had geographic access to hospitals performing ECMO and 98.6% had geographic access to hospitals performing a high annual volume of mechanical ventilation. However, this degree of geographic access required substantial interhospital transfer of patients, including up to two hours by air.
Geographic access to high capability severe acute respiratory failure centers varies widely across states and regions in the United States. Adequate referral center access in the case of disasters and pandemics will depend highly on local and regional care coordination across political boundaries.
对患有严重急性呼吸衰竭的成年人进行最佳治疗需要特定的资源和专业知识。我们试图衡量美国各地民众前往这些治疗中心的可及性。
对美国高能力严重急性呼吸衰竭治疗中心的地理可及性进行横断面分析。我们使用两个标准来定义高能力中心:(1)根据体外生命支持组织2008 - 2013年的报告或2010年为医疗保险受益人提供体外膜肺氧合(ECMO);或(2)根据201年医疗保险理赔数据,医院每年机械通气量大。
美国非联邦急症护理医院。
我们将地理可及性定义为通过航空或地面运输在1小时或2小时内可直接前往或经医院转诊前往的州、地区和全国人口的百分比。在4822家急症护理医院中,148家医院符合我们的ECMO标准,447家医院符合我们的机械通气标准。美国各州和地区的地理可及性差异很大,这取决于中心标准。在没有医院间转诊的情况下,估计全国58.5%的成年人口可前往进行ECMO治疗医院,79.0%的成年人口可前往每年机械通气量大的医院。在医院间转诊且在理想情况下,估计全国96.4%的成年人口可前往进行ECMO治疗医院,98.6%的成年人口可前往每年机械通气量大的医院。然而,这种地理可及性程度需要大量患者在医院间转运,包括长达2小时的空中转运。
美国各州和地区民众前往高能力严重急性呼吸衰竭治疗中心的地理可及性差异很大。在发生灾害和大流行时,能否充分利用转诊中心高度依赖跨越政治边界的地方和区域护理协调。