De Santis Valerio, Chen Xi Lin
Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics, University of L'Aquila, Italy.
Laboratory of Electromagnetic and Acoustics (LEMA), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Radiol Prot. 2014 Jun;34(2):N31-9. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/34/2/N31. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
This article discusses technical issues related to compliance assessment of ICNIRP 2010 basic restrictions. Several difficulties are identified in this study when assessing the spatial average and 99th percentile value of the electric field. These issues are mainly attributed to the lack of clarity in the guideline specifications, which leads to inadequate or irreproducible results. Effects on compliance results due to such ambiguous procedures are hereby investigated, with particular focus on technical issues rather than biological ones. Examples spanning from simple canonical test cases to realistic applications have been selected to highlight the strong variability in dosimetry results. Based on our findings, revisiting the ICNIRP 2010 guidelines is strongly recommended, and proposed alternative solutions are outlined.
本文讨论了与国际非电离辐射防护委员会(ICNIRP)2010年基本限制的合规性评估相关的技术问题。本研究在评估电场的空间平均值和第99百分位值时发现了几个困难。这些问题主要归因于指南规范不够清晰,导致结果不充分或不可重复。特此研究此类模糊程序对合规结果的影响,特别关注技术问题而非生物学问题。选择了从简单的典型测试案例到实际应用的示例,以突出剂量学结果的强烈变异性。基于我们的研究结果,强烈建议重新审视ICNIRP 2010指南,并概述了提出的替代解决方案。