• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中伴或不伴广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍患者的实践团队支持暴露训练的效果评估 - 一项群组随机对照优效试验的研究方案。

Evaluation of a practice team-supported exposure training for patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in primary care - study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled superiority trial.

机构信息

Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Bachstrasse 18, D-07743 Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Trials. 2014 Apr 6;15:112. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-112.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-15-112
PMID:24708672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3983856/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Panic disorder and agoraphobia are debilitating and frequently comorbid anxiety disorders. A large number of patients with these conditions are treated by general practitioners in primary care. Cognitive behavioural exposure exercises have been shown to be effective in reducing anxiety symptoms. Practice team-based case management can improve clinical outcomes for patients with chronic diseases in primary care. The present study compares a practice team-supported, self-managed exposure programme for patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in small general practices to usual care in terms of clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

METHODS/DESIGN: This is a cluster randomised controlled superiority trial with a two-arm parallel group design. General practices represent the units of randomisation. General practitioners recruit adult patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia according to the International Classification of Diseases, version 10 (ICD-10). In the intervention group, patients receive cognitive behaviour therapy-oriented psychoeducation and instructions to self-managed exposure exercises in four manual-based appointments with the general practitioner. A trained health care assistant from the practice team delivers case management and is continuously monitoring symptoms and treatment progress in ten protocol-based telephone contacts with patients. In the control group, patients receive usual care from general practitioners. Outcomes are measured at baseline (T0), at follow-up after six months (T1), and at follow-up after twelve months (T2). The primary outcome is clinical severity of anxiety of patients as measured by the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). To detect a standardised effect size of 0.35 at T1, 222 patients from 37 general practices are included in each group. Secondary outcomes include anxiety-related clinical parameters and health-economic costs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials [http://ISCRTN64669297].

摘要

背景

惊恐障碍和广场恐惧症是使人虚弱且经常并发的焦虑症。大量患有这些疾病的患者在初级保健的全科医生处接受治疗。认知行为暴露练习已被证明可有效减轻焦虑症状。实践团队为基础的病例管理可以改善初级保健中慢性疾病患者的临床结果。本研究比较了在小型全科实践中,实践团队支持的、患者自我管理的惊恐障碍伴或不伴广场恐惧症暴露方案与常规护理在临床疗效和成本效益方面的差异。

方法/设计:这是一项具有两臂平行组设计的集群随机对照优势试验。全科医生诊所是随机分组的单位。全科医生根据国际疾病分类第 10 版(ICD-10)招募患有惊恐障碍伴或不伴广场恐惧症的成年患者。在干预组中,患者接受认知行为治疗为导向的心理教育,并在与全科医生的四次预约中接受自我管理暴露练习的指导。来自实践团队的经过培训的医疗保健助理提供病例管理,并通过与患者进行十次基于方案的电话联系,持续监测症状和治疗进展。在对照组中,患者接受全科医生的常规护理。在基线(T0)、六个月后的随访(T1)和十二个月后的随访(T2)时测量结果。主要结局是使用贝克焦虑量表(BAI)测量的患者焦虑的临床严重程度。为了在 T1 时检测到 0.35 的标准化效应量,每组包括 222 名来自 37 家全科医生诊所的患者。次要结局包括焦虑相关的临床参数和健康经济学成本。

试验注册

当前对照试验[http://ISCRTN64669297]。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fec/3983856/62e61595289d/1745-6215-15-112-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fec/3983856/62e61595289d/1745-6215-15-112-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fec/3983856/62e61595289d/1745-6215-15-112-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a practice team-supported exposure training for patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in primary care - study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled superiority trial.基层医疗中伴或不伴广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍患者的实践团队支持暴露训练的效果评估 - 一项群组随机对照优效试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2014 Apr 6;15:112. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-112.
2
eHealth-supported case management for patients with panic disorder or depression in primary care: Study protocol for a cRCT (PREMA).电子健康支持的初级保健中惊恐障碍或抑郁症患者的病例管理:一项 cRCT(PREMA)的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Dec 2;20(1):662. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3751-3.
3
Efficacy of a hybrid online training for panic symptoms and agoraphobia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一种针对惊恐症状和广场恐惧症的混合式在线培训的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Nov 4;15:427. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-427.
4
Collaborative care for panic disorder, generalised anxiety disorder and social phobia in general practice: study protocol for three cluster-randomised, superiority trials.基层医疗中惊恐障碍、广泛性焦虑障碍和社交恐惧症的协作式照护:三项整群随机优效性试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Aug 16;18(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2120-3.
5
Internet-versus group-administered cognitive behaviour therapy for panic disorder in a psychiatric setting: a randomised trial.互联网与小组管理认知行为疗法治疗精神病环境中的惊恐障碍:一项随机试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Jul 2;10:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-54.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Practice Team-Supported Exposure Training for Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia in Primary Care: a Cluster-Randomized Trial.基层医疗中实践团队支持的惊恐障碍和广场恐惧症暴露疗法的成本效益:一项整群随机试验
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1120-1126. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05658-9. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
7
Efficacy of an Internet-based intervention with self-applied exposure therapy in virtual reality for people with panic disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于互联网的自我应用暴露疗法在虚拟现实中治疗惊恐障碍的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Aug 12;24(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07536-1.
8
Implementing panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy into clinical practice.将以惊恐为焦点的精神动力学心理治疗付诸临床实践。
Can J Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;58(6):326-34. doi: 10.1177/070674371305800604.
9
Psychological therapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人伴或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的心理治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 13;4(4):CD011004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011004.pub2.
10
Evaluation of an Online-Based Self-Help Program for Patients With Panic Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.针对惊恐障碍患者的在线自助项目评估:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 2;27:e54062. doi: 10.2196/54062.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a transdiagnostic mental health intervention in German primary care: study protocol for a parallel-group, two-arm, cluster randomised controlled pilot study.德国初级保健中跨诊断心理健康干预措施的评估:一项平行组、双臂、整群随机对照试验性研究的研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jan 31;11(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01597-6.
2
Improve Mental Health (Improve-MH) in refugee families using a culturally adapted, general practitioner-delivered psychotherapeutic intervention combined with Triple P Online parenting programme: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.采用文化适应的、全科医生提供的心理治疗干预措施联合 Triple P Online 父母养育计划改善难民家庭的心理健康(改善-MH):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 24;14(9):e084080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084080.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive behavioural therapy: why primary care should have it all.认知行为疗法:为何基层医疗应全面具备。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Feb;63(607):103-4. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X663235.
2
Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems.抑郁症和焦虑症的协作护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD006525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006525.pub2.
3
Psychological treatment of anxiety in primary care: a meta-analysis.基层医疗中的焦虑症心理治疗:一项荟萃分析。
Psychometric evaluation and Rasch analyses of the German Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS-D).德国总体焦虑严重程度和障碍量表(OASIS-D)的心理计量学评估和 Rasch 分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 26;13(1):6840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33355-0.
4
Patient characteristics and changes in anxiety symptoms in patients with panic disorder: Post-hoc analysis of the PARADIES cluster randomised trial.惊恐障碍患者的患者特征和焦虑症状变化:PARADIES 集群随机试验的事后分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 29;17(9):e0275509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275509. eCollection 2022.
5
Cost-effectiveness of Practice Team-Supported Exposure Training for Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia in Primary Care: a Cluster-Randomized Trial.基层医疗中实践团队支持的惊恐障碍和广场恐惧症暴露疗法的成本效益:一项整群随机试验
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1120-1126. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05658-9. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
6
Symptom trajectories in patients with panic disorder in a primary care intervention: Results from a randomized controlled trial (PARADISE).在初级保健干预中惊恐障碍患者的症状轨迹:一项随机对照试验(PARADISE)的结果。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 9;9(1):7170. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43487-x.
7
The allocation of resources in the care for patients with panic disorder in Germany: an excess cost analysis informing policy and science.德国惊恐障碍患者护理中的资源分配:一项为政策和科学提供信息的成本超支分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2019 Apr 27;17:9. doi: 10.1186/s12962-019-0177-4. eCollection 2019.
8
Panic Disorder in Primary Care.基层医疗中的惊恐障碍。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Mar 8;116(10):159-166. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0159.
9
Suicidal ideation in primary care patients suffering from panic disorder with or without agoraphobia.有或没有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的初级保健患者中的自杀意念。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 24;18(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1894-5.
10
Psychological therapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人伴或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的心理治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 13;4(4):CD011004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011004.pub2.
Psychol Med. 2013 Feb;43(2):351-61. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712000670. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
4
Coping skills and exposure therapy in panic disorder and agoraphobia: latest advances and future directions.惊恐障碍和广场恐惧症中的应对技巧和暴露疗法:最新进展和未来方向。
Behav Ther. 2012 Jun;43(2):271-84. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
5
Cognitive behavioral therapy in anxiety disorders: current state of the evidence.焦虑症的认知行为疗法:证据现状
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011;13(4):413-21. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2011.13.4/cotte.
6
Efficacy, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of self-help interventions for anxiety disorders: systematic review.自助干预焦虑症的疗效、成本效益和可接受性:系统评价。
Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;200(1):15-21. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.084756.
7
Efficacy of exposure versus cognitive therapy in anxiety disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis.暴露疗法与认知疗法治疗焦虑障碍的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Dec 20;11:200. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-200.
8
The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010.2010 年欧洲的精神障碍和其他脑障碍的规模和负担。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Sep;21(9):655-79. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.07.018.
9
Evidence-based pharmacotherapy of panic disorder: an update.基于证据的惊恐障碍药物治疗:更新。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012 Apr;15(3):403-15. doi: 10.1017/S1461145711000800. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
10
Is the Beck Anxiety Inventory a good tool to assess the severity of anxiety? A primary care study in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA).贝克焦虑量表是否是评估焦虑严重程度的一个好工具?荷兰抑郁和焦虑研究(NESDA)中的初级保健研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Jul 4;12:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-66.