Suppr超能文献

中国黄土丘陵区燕沟流域在特定暴雨事件下的沉积物来源

Sediment sources of Yan'gou watershed in the Loess Hilly region China under a certain rainstorm event.

作者信息

Xu Xue-Xuan, Ju Tong-Jun, Zheng Shi-Qing

机构信息

Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi China.

出版信息

Springerplus. 2013 Dec 11;2(Suppl 1):S2. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-S1-S2. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

At present the large scale vegetation restoration and intensive oil exploiting had brought huge influence on local environment in Yan'an region. the sediment yield data form series experiment plots and hydrological monitoring station in the Yan'an watershed after one rainfall event on July 2, 2005, which included sediment from different land uses (crop-land plot, vegetation plots, hard road surface) and 3 types roads(mountain-road brunches, mountain-road, and mountain-transport way) has been analyzed. Results showed that the erosion intensity of the 3 type roads was respectively 500 t/km(2), 3163 t/km(2), and 13500 t/km(2). The sediment from cropland and grass, shrub land was within 6-184 t/km(2). It stated that sediment from road area which only covered 1% of total area accounted for 42.3% of the total sediment yield, far beyond that from other uses of land. Sediment from grass-land and shrub-land, which covered 70.5% of watershed area, shared 26.7% of the total sediment. The further analysis showed that the 41.2% of total sediment could be detained by re-vegetation. On the contrary, that road constructing brought heavy sediment which offset the benefit of vegetation restore by 58.4%. the suggestion were to adjust our strategy from slope management to the road erosion mitigation Many studies have confirmed it is an important measure to return the steep slope farming land to green, and to restore vegetation in line with local conditions to prevent soil erosion in the Loess Plateau [1, 2]. To implement the measure in western region, the researches on "Grain for Green", returning farmland to forest and grassland, has become popular [3, 4]. Many scholars studied the effects of farming land and trees and grass land on soil water storage [2, 5]. Tang Keli stated that the slope land for farming was the main source of the sediment in Yellow river, and the maximum gradient slope for farming land use was 25° [6]. Many authorities not only pointed out that a far-reaching influence of land-use changes on the distribution of sediment source area but also put forward some new ideas about returning farming to green in Loess Plateau [7, 8]. However, we were still not sure the contribution of returning farmland to forest and grassland on reducing sediment yield of the valley and known it was difficult to identify its contribution to the total sediment yield. Analysis on the contribution of the stream channel and slope sediment yield had some results already [9, 10]. It was still too early to make clear the relationship between the sediment sources changes of the valley and the management. At present, Ecological restoration in the Loess Plateau caused the sediment form the slope land declining [3]. Due to human economic activities, the mountain road developed rapidly, it is inevitable that road erosion has been intensified [11]. A. Rijsdijk and LA Bruijnzeel (1991), [12] based the valley Konto observation, pointed out that although the rural road in the area accounts for only 3% of the area, but the impact on the sediment of this area was tremendous. Nyssen J, Moneryersons J. et al (2002) [13] also think that road without protection is one of the main sources of sediment. Many kinds of protective measures have great importance to the road erosion control. So attentions were paid to the study on the protection all kind of roads. Then what will happen to the soil erosion of the watershed, driven by the vegetation restoration and new road construction? What will happen to the proportion of sediment quality from slope land, road area and gully? A correct understanding of the sediment sources pattern of the typical watershed is of great significance on assessment the roles of vegetation to slope management and the roles of prevention the linear path erosion.

摘要

目前,大规模植被恢复和密集石油开采对延安地区当地环境产生了巨大影响。对延河流域2005年7月2日一次降雨事件后系列试验小区和水文监测站的产沙数据进行了分析,这些数据包括来自不同土地利用类型(农田小区、植被小区、硬质路面)以及3种道路类型(山路分支、山路、山间运输道路)的泥沙。结果表明,3种道路类型的侵蚀强度分别为500 t/km²、3163 t/km²和13500 t/km²。农田以及草地、灌木林地的产沙量在6 - 184 t/km²之间。结果表明,仅占总面积1%的道路区域产沙量占总产沙量的42.3%,远远超过其他土地利用类型的产沙量。占流域面积70.5%的草地和灌木林地的产沙量占总产沙量的26.7%。进一步分析表明,总产沙量的41.2%可通过植被恢复得以拦蓄。相反,道路建设带来的大量泥沙抵消了植被恢复效益的58.4%。建议将治理策略从坡面治理调整为道路侵蚀治理。许多研究证实,陡坡耕地退耕还林还草、因地制宜恢复植被是黄土高原防治水土流失的重要举措[1,2]。为在西部地区实施该举措,“退耕还林还草”相关研究备受关注[3,4]。许多学者研究了耕地以及林地和草地对土壤蓄水的影响[2,5]。唐克丽指出,坡耕地是黄河泥沙的主要来源,耕地利用的最大坡度为25°[6]。许多权威人士不仅指出土地利用变化对泥沙源区分布有深远影响,还提出了黄土高原退耕还林还草的一些新思路[7,8]。然而,我们仍不确定退耕还林还草对减少流域产沙量的贡献,且难以确定其对总产沙量的贡献。关于河道和坡面产沙贡献的分析已有一些结果[9,10]。明确流域泥沙源变化与治理之间的关系仍为时过早。目前,黄土高原的生态恢复使坡面产沙量减少[3]。由于人类经济活动,山间道路迅速发展,道路侵蚀加剧不可避免[11]。A. Rijsdijk和LA Bruijnzeel(1991)[12]基于Konto流域观测指出,该地区乡村道路虽仅占面积的3%,但其对该地区泥沙的影响巨大。Nyssen J、Moneryersons J等(2002)[13]也认为未加防护的道路是泥沙的主要来源之一。多种防护措施对道路侵蚀控制至关重要。因此,对各类道路防护的研究受到关注。那么,在植被恢复和新道路建设的推动下,流域土壤侵蚀会发生什么变化?坡面、道路区域和沟壑的泥沙质量占比会发生什么变化?正确认识典型流域的泥沙源格局对于评估植被对坡面治理的作用以及防治线性道路侵蚀的作用具有重要意义。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验