Cappellozza B I, Cooke R F, Reis M M, Moriel P, Keisler D H, Bohnert D W
Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Burns 97720.
Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Burns 97720
J Anim Sci. 2014 Jun;92(6):2725-34. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-7442. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
This experiment evaluated the influence of supplement composition on performance, reproductive, and metabolic responses of Angus × Hereford heifers consuming a low-quality cool-season forage (8.7% CP and 57% TDN). Sixty heifers (initial age = 226 ± 3 d) were allocated into 15 drylot pens (4 heifers/pen and 5 pens/treatment) and assigned to 1) supplementation with soybean meal (PROT), 2) supplementation with a mixture of cracked corn, soybean meal, and urea (68:22:10 ratio, DM basis; ENER), or 3) no supplementation (CON). Heifers were offered meadow foxtail (Alopecurus pratensis L.) hay for ad libitum consumption during the experiment (d -10 to 160). Beginning on d 0, PROT and ENER were provided daily at a rate of 1.30 and 1.40 kg of DM/heifer to ensure that PROT and ENER intakes were isocaloric and isonitrogenous. Hay and total DMI were recorded for 5 consecutive days during each month of the experiment. Blood was collected every 10 d for analysis of plasma progesterone to evaluate puberty attainment. Blood samples collected on d -10, 60, 120, and 150 were also analyzed for plasma concentrations of plasma urea N (PUN), glucose, insulin, IGF-I, NEFA, and leptin. Liver samples were collected on d 100 from 2 heifers/pen and analyzed for mRNA expression of genes associated with nutritional metabolism. No treatment effect was detected (P = 0.33) on forage DMI. Total DMI, ADG, and mean concentrations of glucose, insulin, and IGF-I as well as hepatic mRNA expression of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were greater (P ≤ 0.02) for PROT and ENER compared with CON and similar between PROT and ENER (P ≥ 0.13). Mean PUN concentrations were also greater (P < 0.01) for PROT and ENER compared with CON, whereas PROT heifers had greater (P < 0.01) PUN compared with ENER. Plasma leptin concentrations were similar between ENER and PROT (P ≥ 0.19) and greater (P ≤ 0.03) for ENER and PROT compared with CON on d 120 and 150 (treatment × day interaction, P = 0.03). Hepatic mRNA expression of mitochondrial phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase was greater (P = 0.05) in PROT compared with CON and ENER and similar between CON and ENER (P = 0.98). The proportion of heifers pubertal on d 160 was greater (P < 0.01) in ENER compared with PROT and CON and similar between PROT and CON (P = 0.38). In conclusion, beef heifers consuming a low-quality cool-season forage had a similar increase in DMI, growth, and overall metabolic status if offered supplements based on soybean meal or corn at 0.5% of BW.
本试验评估了补充料组成对采食低质量冷季牧草(粗蛋白含量8.7%、总可消化养分含量57%)的安格斯×海福特小母牛生产性能、繁殖性能及代谢反应的影响。60头小母牛(初始年龄=226±3天)被分配到15个舍饲栏(每个栏4头小母牛,每个处理5个栏),并分为3组:1)补充豆粕(PROT);2)补充破碎玉米、豆粕和尿素的混合物(干物质基础比例为68:22:10;ENER);3)不补充(CON)。试验期间(第-10至160天),给小母牛提供草地狐尾草(Alopecurus pratensis L.)干草,任其自由采食。从第0天开始,每天给PROT组和ENER组的小母牛分别提供1.30和1.40千克干物质/头的补充料,以确保两组的能量和蛋白质摄入量在热量和氮含量上相等。试验期间每个月连续记录5天的干草采食量和总干物质采食量。每隔10天采集血液,分析血浆孕酮以评估初情期的达到情况。在第-10、60、120和150天采集的血样还用于分析血浆尿素氮(PUN)、葡萄糖、胰岛素、胰岛素样生长因子-I(IGF-I)、非酯化脂肪酸(NEFA)和瘦素的浓度。在第100天,从每个栏中选取2头小母牛采集肝脏样本,分析与营养代谢相关基因的mRNA表达。未检测到处理对牧草干物质采食量的影响(P=0.33)。与CON组相比,PROT组和ENER组的总干物质采食量、平均日增重以及葡萄糖、胰岛素和IGF-I的平均浓度以及肝脏中IGF-I和IGFBP-3的mRNA表达均更高(P≤0.02),且PROT组和ENER组之间相似(P≥0.13)。与CON组相比,PROT组和ENER组的平均PUN浓度也更高(P<0.01),而PROT组的PUN浓度高于ENER组(P<0.01)。在第120天和150天,ENER组和PROT组的血浆瘦素浓度相似(P≥0.19),且均高于CON组(P≤0.03)(处理×天数交互作用,P=0.03)。与CON组和ENER组相比,PROT组肝脏中线粒体磷酸烯醇式丙酮酸羧激酶的mRNA表达更高(P=0.05),CON组和ENER组之间相似(P=0.98)。在第160天,ENER组初情期小母牛的比例高于PROT组和CON组(P<0.01),PROT组和CON组之间相似(P=0.38)。总之,采食低质量冷季牧草的肉用小母牛,如果按体重的0.5%提供基于豆粕或玉米的补充料,其干物质采食量、生长性能和整体代谢状态的增加相似。