• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多变量预后因素分析在二线化疗治疗晚期胆道癌中的应用。

Multivariate prognostic factors analysis for second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Unit of Medical Oncology, Azienda USL2 Lucca Via dell'Ospedale 1, 55100 Lucca, Italy.

Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20133 Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2014 Apr 29;110(9):2165-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.190. Epub 2014 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2014.190
PMID:24714745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4007244/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of second-line chemotherapy (CT) is not established in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). We investigated the outcome of aBTC patients treated with second-line CT and devised a prognostic model.

METHODS

Baseline clinical and laboratory data of 300 consecutive aBTC patients were collected and association with overall survival (OS) was investigated by multivariable Cox models.

RESULTS

The following parameters resulted independently associated with longer OS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (P<0.001; hazard ratio (HR), 0.348; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.215-0.562), CA19.9 lower than median (P=0.013; HR, 0.574; 95% CI 0.370-0.891), progression-free survival after first-line CT ≥ 6 months (P=0.027; HR, 0.633; 95% CI 0.422-0.949) and previous surgery on primary tumour (P=0.027; HR, 0.609; 95% CI 0.392-0.945). We grouped the 249 patients with complete data available into three categories according to the number of fulfilled risk factors: median OS times for good-risk (zero to one factors), intermediate-risk (two factors) and poor-risk (three to four factors) groups were 13.1, 6.6 and 3.7 months, respectively (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Easily available clinical and laboratory factors predict prognosis of aBTC patients undergoing second-line CT. This model allows individual patient-risk stratification and may help in treatment decision and trial design.

摘要

背景

二线化疗(CT)在晚期胆道癌(aBTC)中的作用尚未确定。我们研究了接受二线 CT 治疗的 aBTC 患者的结果,并设计了一个预后模型。

方法

收集了 300 例连续 aBTC 患者的基线临床和实验室数据,并通过多变量 Cox 模型研究其与总生存期(OS)的关系。

结果

以下参数与更长的 OS 独立相关:东部肿瘤协作组表现状态为 0(P<0.001;风险比(HR),0.348;95%置信区间(CI),0.215-0.562),CA19.9 低于中位数(P=0.013;HR,0.574;95%CI,0.370-0.891),一线 CT 后无进展生存期≥6 个月(P=0.027;HR,0.633;95%CI,0.422-0.949)和原发性肿瘤的先前手术(P=0.027;HR,0.609;95%CI,0.392-0.945)。我们根据满足风险因素的数量将 249 例具有完整数据的患者分为三组:良好风险(零至一个因素)、中危(两个因素)和差危(三个至四个因素)组的中位 OS 时间分别为 13.1、6.6 和 3.7 个月,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。

结论

易于获得的临床和实验室因素可预测接受二线 CT 治疗的 aBTC 患者的预后。该模型可对患者进行个体风险分层,并有助于治疗决策和试验设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4413/4007244/14e3c8b9b2a8/bjc2014190f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4413/4007244/14e3c8b9b2a8/bjc2014190f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4413/4007244/14e3c8b9b2a8/bjc2014190f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Multivariate prognostic factors analysis for second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer.多变量预后因素分析在二线化疗治疗晚期胆道癌中的应用。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Apr 29;110(9):2165-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.190. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
2
A prognostic model in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy.用于一线化疗的晚期胆道癌患者的预后模型。
Acta Oncol. 2021 Oct;60(10):1317-1324. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1953704. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
3
Prognostic factors and predictive model in patients with advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy.一线姑息化疗的晚期胆管腺癌患者的预后因素及预测模型
Cancer. 2009 Sep 15;115(18):4148-55. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24472.
4
Prediction of survival with second-line therapy in biliary tract cancer: Actualisation of the AGEO CT2BIL cohort and European multicentre validations.二线治疗在胆道癌中预测生存:AGEO CT2BIL 队列的实际情况和欧洲多中心验证。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Apr;111:94-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.01.019. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
5
Hyperfibrinogenemia predicts poor prognosis in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.高纤维蛋白原血症预示晚期胆管癌患者预后不良。
Tumour Biol. 2016 Mar;37(3):3535-42. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4184-6. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
6
Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in biliary tract cancer.中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值作为胆道癌的预后因素。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jun;50(9):1581-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
7
Glasgow Prognostic Score predicts poor prognosis among advanced biliary tract cancer patients with good performance status.格拉斯哥预后评分预测了功能状态良好的晚期胆管癌患者的预后不良。
Med Oncol. 2014 Nov;31(11):287. doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0287-y. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
8
Second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer: a single center, retrospective analysis of 294 cases.二线化疗在晚期或复发性胆道癌患者中的应用:单中心回顾性分析 294 例。
Invest New Drugs. 2018 Dec;36(6):1093-1102. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0670-1. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
9
Patients with recurrent biliary tract cancer have a better prognosis than those with unresectable disease: retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional experience with patients of advanced biliary tract cancer who received palliative chemotherapy.复发性胆管癌患者的预后优于不可切除疾病患者:对接受姑息化疗的晚期胆管癌患者的多机构经验进行回顾性分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Feb;21(2):98-104. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.2. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
10
Feasibility and benefits of second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer: a large retrospective study.二线化疗在晚期胆道癌中的可行性和获益:一项大型回顾性研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jan;49(2):329-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
PIWI-interacting RNAs (PiRNAs) as emerging biomarkers and therapeutic targets in biliary tract cancers: A comprehensive review.PIWI相互作用RNA(PiRNAs)作为胆管癌中新出现的生物标志物和治疗靶点:一项综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 27;10(13):e33767. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33767. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
2
National guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.国家肝门部胆管癌诊断和治疗指南。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 7;30(9):1018-1042. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1018.
3
Cirrhosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic importance and impact on survival.

本文引用的文献

1
Second-line therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer: what should be the standard?二线治疗在晚期胆道癌中的应用:标准应该是什么?
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013 Nov;88(2):368-74. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
2
Outcome of second-line chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer.
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Apr;49(6):1511. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.11.024. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
3
Feasibility and benefits of second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer: a large retrospective study.二线化疗在晚期胆道癌中的可行性和获益:一项大型回顾性研究。
肝内胆管细胞癌中的肝硬化:预后意义及对生存的影响。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 May 13;23(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02710-w.
4
Survival trends over 20 years in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma: Results from a national retrospective analysis of 922 cases in Italy.晚期胆管癌患者20年生存趋势:意大利922例病例的全国性回顾性分析结果
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 5;13:1128930. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1128930. eCollection 2023.
5
Survival Analysis of 1140 Patients with Biliary Cancer and Benefit from Concurrent Renin-Angiotensin Antagonists, Statins, or Aspirin with Systemic Therapy.1140 例胆道癌患者的生存分析及联合肾素-血管紧张素拮抗剂、他汀类药物或阿司匹林与全身治疗的获益。
Oncologist. 2023 Jun 2;28(6):531-541. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad063.
6
Hemoglobin and Neutrophil Count as Prognostic Factors in Cholangiocarcinoma Patients in 2nd Line Treatment Setting: Results from a Small Monocentric Retrospective Study.血红蛋白和中性粒细胞计数作为二线治疗胆管癌患者的预后因素:一项小中心回顾性研究的结果。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Jan 11;30(1):1032-1045. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30010079.
7
Prognostic Value of Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A Single-Institution Study and Literature Review.正电子发射断层扫描在晚期胆管癌中的预后价值:一项单机构研究及文献综述
Cureus. 2022 Nov 2;14(11):e31026. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31026. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
Pemigatinib for adults with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements.培米替尼用于治疗既往接受过治疗的、局部晚期或转移性胆管癌且伴有FGFR2融合/重排的成人患者。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 6;15:17562848221115317. doi: 10.1177/17562848221115317. eCollection 2022.
9
Development and Multicentre Validation of the Modena Score to Predict Survival in Advanced Biliary Cancers Undergoing Second-Line Chemotherapy.用于预测晚期胆管癌二线化疗生存情况的摩德纳评分的开发与多中心验证
Cancer Manag Res. 2022 Mar 5;14:983-993. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S346235. eCollection 2022.
10
Cholangiocarcinoma: the quest for a second-line systemic treatment.胆管癌:二线全身治疗的探索
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Apr;8(Suppl 3):S275-S288. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2018.10.05.
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jan;49(2):329-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
4
Biliary tract carcinomas: from chemotherapy to targeted therapy.胆道癌:从化疗到靶向治疗。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013 Feb;85(2):136-48. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
5
Role of chemotherapy in treatments for biliary tract cancer.化疗在胆管癌治疗中的作用。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012 Jul;19(4):337-41. doi: 10.1007/s00534-011-0494-2.
6
Cholangiocarcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and diagnosis.胆管癌:流行病学、危险因素、发病机制及诊断
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011 Apr;13(2):182-7. doi: 10.1007/s11894-011-0178-8.
7
Best supportive care compared with chemotherapy for unresectable gall bladder cancer: a randomized controlled study.无法切除的胆囊癌采用最佳支持治疗与化疗的比较:一项随机对照研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 20;28(30):4581-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3605. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
8
Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with biliary tract cancer: a comparative multicentre study in Japan.吉西他滨单药或联合顺铂治疗胆道癌患者:日本多中心比较研究。
Br J Cancer. 2010 Aug 10;103(4):469-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605779. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
9
Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer.顺铂联合吉西他滨与吉西他滨治疗胆管癌。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721.
10
Prognostic factors and predictive model in patients with advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy.一线姑息化疗的晚期胆管腺癌患者的预后因素及预测模型
Cancer. 2009 Sep 15;115(18):4148-55. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24472.