Suppr超能文献

以色列胃肠病学家结肠镜息肉切除术实践的一项调查。

A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practice amongst Israeli gastroenterologists.

作者信息

Carter Dan, Beer-Gabel Marc, Zbar Andrew, Avidan Benjamin, Bardan Eytan

机构信息

Departments of Gastroenterology (Dan Carter, Marc Beer-Gabel, Benjamin Avidan, Eytan Bardan).

Surgery (Andrew Zbar), Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Ann Gastroenterol. 2013;26(2):135-140.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Polypectomy techniques have been implicated as factors in the effectiveness of polyp resection. The range of polypectomy practices among gastroenterologists in Israel is unknown.

METHODS

A structured survey was sent to all Israeli gastroenterology departments in all 15 major academic hospitals and to 3 central outpatient clinics.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 100 clinicians (45% contacted) derived from 13 of 15 academic centers (85%) and from all 3 outpatient clinics. Significant differences were noted in the preferred polypectomy for the resection of polyps 1-3 mm and 7-9 mm in diameter whereas for those polyps 4-6 mm in diameter, both the hot forceps and hot snare were most commonly used technique. Coagulation was employed in 42% of cases, pure cutting in 20% and blend current in 38% of cases. Narrow band imaging was used by 54% of practitioners, and only 33% of gastroenterologists regularly used dye spraying techniques. When removing pedunculated polyps >1 cm in diameter, 75% did not use any specific measures designed to prevent perforation or hemorrhage. Performance of >300 colonoscopies per year was associated with a greater use of dye spraying techniques and working in a hospital was more likely to be accompanied by clip deployment to larger polypectomy stalks as part of the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate considerable heterogeneity in the techniques used for removal of polyps <1 cm. Most practitioners do not regularly use advanced techniques for polyp detection or for the prevention of post-polypectomy bleeding.

摘要

背景

息肉切除技术被认为是息肉切除效果的影响因素。以色列胃肠病学家的息肉切除操作范围尚不清楚。

方法

向以色列所有15家主要学术医院的胃肠病科以及3家中央门诊诊所发送了结构化调查问卷。

结果

100名临床医生(45%的被联系者)完成了调查,他们来自15个学术中心中的13个(85%)以及所有3家门诊诊所。对于直径1 - 3毫米和7 - 9毫米的息肉,在首选息肉切除方法上存在显著差异,而对于直径4 - 6毫米的息肉,热活检钳和热圈套器是最常用的技术。42%的病例采用凝固模式,20%采用纯切割模式,38%采用混合电流模式。54%的从业者使用窄带成像,只有33%的胃肠病学家经常使用染料喷洒技术。当切除直径>1厘米的有蒂息肉时,75%的人未采取任何旨在预防穿孔或出血的特定措施。每年进行>300例结肠镜检查与更多地使用染料喷洒技术相关,并且在医院工作时,作为操作的一部分,对较大息肉蒂部进行夹子夹闭的可能性更大。

结论

我们的结果表明,在切除<1厘米息肉的技术方面存在相当大的异质性。大多数从业者不经常使用先进的息肉检测技术或预防息肉切除术后出血的技术。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Analysis of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding in a colorectal clinic.结直肠诊所息肉切除术后延迟出血的分析
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011 Feb;27(1):13-6. doi: 10.3393/jksc.2011.27.1.13. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
4
Biopsy forceps is inadequate for the resection of diminutive polyps.活检钳对于切除微小息肉是不够的。
Endoscopy. 2011 Apr;43(4):312-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256086. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
8
Colonoscopic polypectomy and associated techniques.结肠镜息肉切除术及相关技术。
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug 7;16(29):3630-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i29.3630.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验