Rutter Matthew D, Chattree Amit, Barbour Jamie A, Thomas-Gibson Siwan, Bhandari Pradeep, Saunders Brian P, Veitch Andrew M, Anderson John, Rembacken Bjorn J, Loughrey Maurice B, Pullan Rupert, Garrett William V, Lewis Gethin, Dolwani Sunil
Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton on Tees, UK School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Stockton on Tees, UK.
School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Stockton on Tees, UK.
Gut. 2015 Dec;64(12):1847-73. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309576. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
These guidelines provide an evidence-based framework for the management of patients with large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs), in addition to identifying key performance indicators (KPIs) that permit the audit of quality outcomes. These are areas not previously covered by British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Guidelines.A National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) compliant BSG guideline development process was used throughout and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool was used to structure the guideline development process. A systematic review of literature was conducted for English language articles up to May 2014 concerning the assessment and management of LNPCPs. Quality of evaluated studies was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Methodology Checklist System. Proposed recommendation statements were evaluated by each member of the Guideline Development Group (GDG) on a scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) with >80% agreement required for consensus to be reached. Where consensus was not reached a modified Delphi process was used to re-evaluate and modify proposed statements until consensus was reached or the statement discarded. A round table meeting was subsequently held to finalise recommendations and to evaluate the strength of evidence discussed. The GRADE tool was used to assess the strength of evidence and strength of recommendation for finalised statements.KPIs, a training framework and potential research questions for the management of LNPCPs were also developed. It is hoped that these guidelines will improve the assessment and management of LNPCPs.
这些指南为大型无蒂结直肠息肉(LNPCP)患者的管理提供了一个循证框架,此外还确定了用于审核质量结果的关键绩效指标(KPI)。这些领域以前未被英国胃肠病学会(BSG)指南涵盖。整个过程采用了符合英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)标准的BSG指南制定流程,并使用了研究与评估指南评估(AGREE II)工具来构建指南制定流程。对截至2014年5月的关于LNPCP评估和管理的英文文章进行了系统的文献综述。使用苏格兰校际指南网络(SIGN)方法检查表系统评估所评估研究的质量。指南制定小组(GDG)的每个成员对提议的推荐声明按1(强烈同意)至5(强烈不同意)的等级进行评估,达成共识需要>80%的同意率。未达成共识时,采用改良的德尔菲法重新评估和修改提议的声明,直到达成共识或放弃该声明。随后召开了一次圆桌会议,以敲定建议并评估所讨论证据的强度。使用GRADE工具评估最终声明的证据强度和推荐强度。还制定了LNPCP管理的KPI、培训框架和潜在研究问题。希望这些指南将改善LNPCP的评估和管理。