Dea Nicolas, Fisher Charles G
Neurol Res. 2014 Jun;36(6):524-9. doi: 10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000365. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
Treatment modalities for metastatic spine disease have significantly expanded over the last two decades. This expansion occurred in many different fields. Improvement in surgical techniques and instrumentation now allow the oncologic spine surgeons to effectively circumferentially decompress the neural elements without compromising stability. Percutaneous techniques, both vertebral augmentation and pre-operative endovascular embolization procedures, also greatly benefit patients suffering from spinal column metastasis. Imaging technology advances has contributed to better pre-operative planning and the development of highly conformational radiation techniques, thus permitting the delivery of high-dose radiation to tumors, while avoiding radiotoxicity to the spinal cord and other vital structures. These new developments, combined with evidence-based stability and disease-specific quality of life scores now allow not only better treatment, but also a solid foundation for high-quality research. Spine oncology literature currently suffers from a lack of high-quality evidence due to low prevalence of the disease and complex methodological issues. However, when following evidence-based medicine principles, which incorporate best available evidence, clinical expertise and patient preference, sound, evidence-based recommendations can be made regarding the abovementioned treatment modalities.
在过去二十年中,转移性脊柱疾病的治疗方式有了显著扩展。这种扩展发生在许多不同领域。手术技术和器械的改进使脊柱肿瘤外科医生能够在不影响稳定性的情况下有效地对神经结构进行全周减压。经皮技术,包括椎体强化和术前血管内栓塞术,也极大地造福了患有脊柱转移瘤的患者。成像技术的进步有助于更好的术前规划和高度适形放疗技术的发展,从而能够在避免对脊髓和其他重要结构产生放射毒性的同时,将高剂量辐射传递到肿瘤部位。这些新进展,再加上基于证据的稳定性和疾病特异性生活质量评分,现在不仅允许进行更好的治疗,也为高质量研究奠定了坚实基础。由于该疾病的低发病率和复杂的方法学问题,脊柱肿瘤学文献目前缺乏高质量证据。然而,遵循将最佳现有证据、临床专业知识和患者偏好相结合的循证医学原则,可以就上述治疗方式提出合理的、基于证据的建议。