Juo Y Y, Johnston F M, Zhang D Y, Juo H H, Wang H, Pappou E P, Yu T, Easwaran H, Baylin S, van Engeland M, Ahuja N
Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Ann Oncol. 2014 Dec;25(12):2314-2327. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu149. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
Divergent findings regarding the prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients exist in current literature. We aim to review data from published studies in order to examine the association between CIMP and CRC prognosis.
A comprehensive search for studies reporting disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), or cancer-specific mortality of CRC patients stratified by CIMP is carried out. Study findings are summarized descriptively and quantitatively, using adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) as summary statistics.
Thirty-three studies reporting survival in 10 635 patients are included for review. Nineteen studies provide data suitable for meta-analysis. The definition of CIMP regarding gene panel, marker threshold, and laboratory method varies across studies. Pooled analysis shows that CIMP is significantly associated with shorter DFS (pooled HR estimate 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.97, Q = 3.95, I(2) = 0%) and OS (pooled HR estimate 1.43; 95% CI 1.18-1.73, Q = 4.03, I(2) = 0%) among CRC patients irrespective of microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Subgroup analysis of microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC patients also shows significant association between shorter OS (pooled HR estimate 1.37; 95% CI 1.12-1.68, Q = 4.45, I(2) = 33%) and CIMP. Seven studies have explored CIMP's value as a predictive factor on stage II and III CRC patient's DFS after receiving adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) therapy: of these, four studies showed that adjuvant chemotherapy conferred a DFS benefit among CIMP(+) patients, one concluded to the contrary, and two found no significant correlation. Insufficient data was present for statistical synthesis of CIMP's predictive value among CRC patients receiving adjuvant 5-FU therapy.
CIMP is independently associated with significantly worse prognosis in CRC patients. However, CIMP's value as a predictive factor in assessing whether adjuvant 5-FU therapy will confer additional survival benefit to CRC patients remained to be determined through future prospective randomized studies.
目前文献中关于结直肠癌(CRC)患者中CpG岛甲基化表型(CIMP)的预后价值存在不同的研究结果。我们旨在回顾已发表研究的数据,以检验CIMP与CRC预后之间的关联。
全面检索报告按CIMP分层的CRC患者无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)或癌症特异性死亡率的研究。研究结果采用调整后的风险比(HRs)作为汇总统计量进行描述性和定量总结。
纳入33项报告10635例患者生存情况的研究进行综述。19项研究提供了适合进行荟萃分析的数据。不同研究中关于基因panel、标志物阈值和实验室方法的CIMP定义各不相同。汇总分析显示,无论微卫星不稳定性(MSI)状态如何,CIMP与CRC患者较短的DFS(汇总HR估计值1.45;95%置信区间(CI)1.07 - 1.97,Q = 3.95,I² = )和OS(汇总HR估计值1.43;95% CI 1.18 - 1.73,Q = 4.03,I² = 0%)显著相关。微卫星稳定(MSS)CRC患者的亚组分析也显示较短的OS(汇总HR估计值1.37;95% CI 1.12 - 1.68,Q = 4.45,I² = 33%)与CIMP之间存在显著关联。7项研究探讨了CIMP作为II期和III期CRC患者接受辅助5 - 氟尿嘧啶(5 - FU)治疗后DFS预测因素的价值:其中,4项研究表明辅助化疗在CIMP(+)患者中带来DFS获益,1项得出相反结论,2项未发现显著相关性。在接受辅助5 - FU治疗的CRC患者中,缺乏足够数据对CIMP的预测价值进行统计综合分析。
CIMP与CRC患者显著较差的预后独立相关。然而,CIMP作为评估辅助5 - FU治疗是否会给CRC患者带来额外生存获益的预测因素的价值,仍有待通过未来的前瞻性随机研究来确定。