Hughes Laura A E, Khalid-de Bakker Carolina A J, Smits Kim M, van den Brandt Piet A, Jonkers Daisy, Ahuja Nita, Herman James G, Weijenberg Matty P, van Engeland Manon
Dept. of Epidemiology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6200MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Jan;1825(1):77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2011.10.005. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
In recent years, attention has focused on the biology and potential clinical importance of the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer (CRC). While it is generally well accepted that etiologically and clinically distinct subgroups exist in this disease, a precise definition of CIMP remains to be established. Here, we summarize existing literature that documents the prevalence of CIMP in CRC, with particular attention to the various methods and definitions used to classify a tumor as CIMP positive. Through a systematic review on both case-series and population based studies, we examined only original research articles reporting on sporadic CRC and/or adenomas in unselected cases. Forty-eight papers published between January 1999 and August 2011 met the inclusion criteria. We describe the use of multiple gene panels, marker threshold values, and laboratory techniques which results in a wide range in the prevalence of CIMP. Because there is no universal standard or consensus on quantifying the phenotype, establishing its true prevalence is a challenge. This bottleneck is becoming increasingly evident as molecular pathological epidemiology continues to offer possibilities for clear answers regarding environmental risk factors and disease trends. For the first time, large, unselected series of cases are available for analysis, but comparing populations and pooling data will remain a challenge unless a universal definition of CIMP and a consensus on analysis can be reached, and the primary cause of CIMP identified.
近年来,人们的注意力集中在结直肠癌(CRC)中CpG岛甲基化表型(CIMP)的生物学特性及其潜在的临床重要性上。虽然人们普遍认为这种疾病存在病因和临床特征各异的亚组,但CIMP的精确定义仍有待确定。在此,我们总结了现有文献中关于CRC中CIMP发生率的记录,尤其关注用于将肿瘤分类为CIMP阳性的各种方法和定义。通过对病例系列研究和基于人群的研究进行系统综述,我们仅考察了报道散发性CRC和/或未选择病例中的腺瘤的原创研究文章。1999年1月至2011年8月期间发表的48篇论文符合纳入标准。我们描述了多种基因组合、标志物阈值和实验室技术的使用情况,这些因素导致CIMP发生率的范围很广。由于在量化该表型方面没有通用标准或共识,确定其真实发生率是一项挑战。随着分子病理流行病学不断为明确环境危险因素和疾病趋势提供可能的答案,这一瓶颈变得越来越明显。首次有大量未选择的病例系列可供分析,但除非能达成CIMP的通用定义和分析共识,并确定CIMP的主要原因,否则比较不同人群和汇总数据仍将是一项挑战。