University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN, USA,
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Jun;43(6):1018-24. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0118-7. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
Positive youth development (PYD) and resilience science differ in emphasis and focus but share many roots, assumptions, concepts, and goals. Both frameworks are grounded in developmental systems theory, both are focused on positive adaptation, and both are translational, sharing a common goal of promoting positive development. Yet there also are differences. This commentary examines the concepts, methods, and goals that define the PYD framework as embodied by the 4-H Study of PYD from the perspective of contemporary resilience science in human development, with an eye toward delineating similarities, differences, and future directions.
积极青年发展(PYD)和韧性科学在重点和关注点上有所不同,但它们有许多共同的根源、假设、概念和目标。这两个框架都基于发展系统理论,都专注于积极适应,并且都具有转化性,共同目标是促进积极发展。然而,它们也存在差异。本评论从当代人类发展韧性科学的角度,考察了由“4-H 积极青年发展研究”体现的 PYD 框架的概念、方法和目标,着眼于描绘它们的相似之处、差异和未来方向。