• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节盂唇的初次修复:2 年随访结果。

Primary repair of the acetabular labrum: outcomes with 2 years' follow-up.

机构信息

Nashville Sports Medicine Foundation, Nashville, Tennessee, U.S.A.

Nashville Sports Medicine Foundation, Nashville, Tennessee, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2014 May;30(5):588-92. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.007.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.007
PMID:24725313
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the results and outcomes of primary repair of the torn acetabular labrum.

METHODS

All patients undergoing hip arthroscopy are prospectively assessed solely with the modified Harris Hip Score, which is an outcomes tool. Over a 4-year period, 37 patients (38 hips) underwent primary repair of a torn acetabular labrum and had reached 2 years' follow-up. No cases were excluded. For perspective on the frequency of this procedure, the ratio of labral refixations after pincer femoroacetabular impingement correction to primary repairs was evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age was 26 years (range, 11 to 44 years). There were 26 female and 11 male patients, with 20 right and 18 left hips. The mean improvement in the modified Harris Hip Score was 18.9 points (70.5 points preoperatively and 89.4 points postoperatively), with 35 hips (92%) showing improvement, including good and excellent results in 35 hips (92%). Associated pathology included articular damage (21 hips), ligamentum teres (14 hips), cam femoroacetabular impingement (11 hips), borderline dysplasia (center-edge angle, 20° to 25°) (3 hips), dysplasia (center-edge angle <20°) (2 hips), and iliopsoas (2 hips). Four patients underwent repeat arthroscopy at a mean of 10 months (range, 5 to 15 months) postoperatively. The labral repair site was fully healed in each of these cases. There were no complications. During the study period, a total of 1,574 arthroscopic hip procedures were performed, including 439 labral refixations, representing an 11.6:1 ratio of refixation to repair.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed good clinical results of primary repair with favorable outcomes and evidence of good healing, even among the 11% of patients who required repeat arthroscopy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估撕裂髋臼唇的初次修复的结果和结局。

方法

所有接受髋关节镜检查的患者均仅接受改良 Harris 髋关节评分(一种评估结果的工具)进行前瞻性评估。在 4 年期间,有 37 名患者(38 髋)接受了撕裂髋臼唇的初次修复,并达到了 2 年的随访。无病例被排除。为了了解该手术的频率,评估了在 pincer 型股骨髋臼撞击症矫正后进行盂唇修复与初次修复的比例。

结果

平均年龄为 26 岁(范围:11 岁至 44 岁);26 名女性和 11 名男性患者,20 髋为右侧,18 髋为左侧;改良 Harris 髋关节评分平均提高了 18.9 分(术前 70.5 分,术后 89.4 分),35 髋(92%)得到改善,包括 35 髋(92%)的良好和优秀结果。相关病变包括关节损伤(21 髋)、圆韧带(14 髋)、凸轮型股骨髋臼撞击症(11 髋)、边界性发育不良(中心边缘角 20°至 25°)(3 髋)、发育不良(中心边缘角<20°)(2 髋)和髂腰肌(2 髋)。4 例患者在术后平均 10 个月(5 个月至 15 个月)时再次接受关节镜检查。这些病例中,盂唇修复部位均完全愈合。无并发症发生。在研究期间,共进行了 1574 例髋关节镜手术,包括 439 例盂唇修复,修复与修复的比例为 11.6:1。

结论

本研究显示初次修复的临床效果良好,结局良好,有证据表明愈合良好,即使在需要再次关节镜检查的 11%的患者中也是如此。

证据水平

IV 级,治疗性病例系列。

相似文献

1
Primary repair of the acetabular labrum: outcomes with 2 years' follow-up.髋关节盂唇的初次修复:2 年随访结果。
Arthroscopy. 2014 May;30(5):588-92. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.007.
2
Arthroscopic debridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement: mean 3.5-year follow-up.髋关节镜下清创术与股骨髋臼撞击症相关髋臼唇的再固定术:平均 3.5 年随访。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 May;40(5):1015-21. doi: 10.1177/0363546511434578. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
3
Arthroscopic debridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement.关节镜下清创术与髋臼盂唇修复术治疗伴有股骨髋臼撞击症的髋臼盂唇损伤对比
Arthroscopy. 2009 Apr;25(4):369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.12.014. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
4
Clinical and Radiographic Predictors for Unsalvageable Labral Tear at the Time of Initial Hip Arthroscopic Management for Femoroacetabular Impingement.在初次髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击症时,预测不可挽救的盂唇撕裂的临床和影像学指标。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;47(9):2029-2037. doi: 10.1177/0363546519856018. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
5
Midterm Follow-Up and Assessment of Cartilage Thickness by Arthro-Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Arthroscopic Cam Resection, Labral Repair, and Rim Trimming Without Labral Detachment.关节镜下凸轮切除术、盂唇修复和边缘修整而不游离盂唇后,关节磁共振成像的中期随访和软骨厚度评估。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Feb;37(2):541-551. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.012. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
6
Arthroscopic labral base repair in the hip: clinical results of a described technique.髋关节镜下盂唇基底部修复:一种描述技术的临床结果。
Arthroscopy. 2014 Feb;30(2):208-13. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.021.
7
Arthroscopic Capsular Plication and Labral Seal Restoration in Borderline Hip Dysplasia: 2-Year Clinical Outcomes in 55 Cases.关节镜下关节囊折叠术及髋臼唇缘密封修复术治疗临界性髋关节发育不良:55例患者的2年临床疗效
Arthroscopy. 2017 Jul;33(7):1332-1340. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.037. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
8
Hip arthroscopy for labral pathology: prospective analysis with 10-year follow-up.髋关节镜治疗盂唇病变:10年随访的前瞻性分析
Arthroscopy. 2009 Apr;25(4):365-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.02.001.
9
Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: Arthroscopic Management for Extreme Soft-Tissue Hip Instability.埃勒斯-当洛综合征:关节镜治疗极度软组织性髋关节不稳
Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec;31(12):2287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
10
What Are the Risk Factors for Revision Surgery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at 7-year Followup?髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击症7年随访后翻修手术的危险因素有哪些?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1169-1177. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5115-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Female Patient Representation Is Acceptable in Studies Regarding Hip Arthroscopy With Labral Repair Yet Deficient in Key Study Design and Sport-Specific Features.在关于髋关节镜下盂唇修复的研究中,女性患者的代表性尚可,但在关键研究设计和特定运动特征方面存在不足。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Dec 16;7(2):101069. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101069. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
The Incidence and Outcomes Following Treatment of Capsulolabral Adhesions in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.髋关节镜下治疗关节囊盂唇粘连的发生率和转归:系统评价。
Iowa Orthop J. 2023 Dec;43(2):146-155.
3
Postoperative creatine kinase elevation following hip arthroscopy and associated risk factors.
髋关节镜检查术后肌酸激酶升高及相关危险因素
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019 Nov;53(6):397-401. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
4
The outcome of arthroscopic repair of acetabular labral tears using the iHOT-33.关节镜下髋臼唇撕裂修复的 iHOT-33 疗效。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 13;20(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2611-3.
5
Patients aged in their 70s do not have a high risk of progressive osteoarthritis following arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement correction and labral preservation surgery.70 多岁的患者在接受关节镜下股骨髋臼撞击症矫正和盂唇保留手术后,不会有进展性骨关节炎的高风险。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 May;28(5):1648-1655. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05520-4. Epub 2019 May 7.
6
The Hip Labrum Reconstruction: Indications and Outcomes-an Updated Systematic Review.髋关节盂唇重建:适应证与结果——一项更新的系统评价
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Jun;12(2):156-165. doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09546-6.
7
Arthroscopic labral reconstruction using fascia lata allograft: shuttle technique and minimum two-year results.使用阔筋膜同种异体移植进行关节镜下盂唇重建:穿梭技术及至少两年的结果
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018 Aug 10;5(3):247-258. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hny028. eCollection 2018 Aug.
8
A systematic review-meta-analysis of venous thromboembolic events following primary hip arthroscopy for FAI: clinical and epidemiologic considerations.针对髋关节撞击综合征进行初次髋关节关节镜检查后静脉血栓栓塞事件的系统评价-荟萃分析:临床与流行病学考量
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018 Aug 17;5(3):190-201. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hny029. eCollection 2018 Aug.
9
[Mid-term effectiveness of arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement].[关节镜手术治疗股骨髋臼撞击症的中期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 15;32(2):129-133. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201710046.
10
Does duration of symptoms affect clinical outcome after hip arthroscopy for labral tears? Analysis of prospectively collected outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up.症状持续时间是否会影响髋关节镜治疗盂唇撕裂后的临床结果?对前瞻性收集的、至少随访2年的结果进行分析。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017 Jun 15;4(4):308-317. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnx023. eCollection 2017 Dec.