Stevanato Lara, Sinden John D
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014 Apr 11;5(2):49. doi: 10.1186/scrt437.
Stem cells have the ability to self-renew or to differentiate into numerous cell types; however, our understanding of how to control and exploit this potential is currently limited. An emerging hypothesis is that microRNAs (miRNAs) play a central role in controlling stem cell-fate determination. Herein, we have characterized the effects of miRNAs in differentiated human neural stem cells (hNSCs) by using a cell line currently being tested in clinical trials for stroke disability (NCT01151124, Clinicaltrials.gov).
HNSCs were differentiated on 2- (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) cultures for 1 and 3 weeks. Quantification of hNSC differentiation was measured with real-time PCR and axon outgrowth. The miRNA PCR arrays were implemented to investigate differential expression profiles in differentiated hNSCs. Evaluation of miRNA effects on hNSCs was performed by using transfection of miRNA mimics, real-time PCR, Western blot, and immunocytochemistry.
The 3D substrate promoted enhanced hNSC differentiation coupled with a loss of cell proliferation. Differentiated hNSCs exhibited a similar miRNA profiling. However, in 3D samples, the degree and timing of regulation were significantly different in miRNA members of cluster mi-R17 and miR-96-182, and hsa-miR-302a. Overall, hNSC 3D cultures demonstrated differential regulation of miRNAs involved in hNSC stemness, cell proliferation, and differentiation. The miRNA mimic analysis of hsa-miR-146b-5p and hsa-miR-99a confirmed induction of lineage-committed progenitors. Downregulated miRNAs were more abundant; those most significantly downregulated were selected, and their putative target mRNAs analyzed with the aim of unraveling their functionality. In differentiated hNSCs, downregulated hsa-miR-96 correlated with SOX5 upregulation of gene and protein expression; similar results were obtained for hsa-miR-302a, hsa-miR-182, hsa-miR-7, hsa-miR-20a/b, and hsa-miR-17 and their target NR4A3. Moreover, SOX5 was identified as a direct target gene of hsa-miR-96, and NR43A, a direct target of hsa-miR-7 and hsa-mir-17 by luciferase reporter assays. Therefore, the regulatory role of these miRNAs may occur through targeting NR4A3 and SOX5, both reported as modulators of cell-cycle progression and axon length.
The results provide new insight into the identification of specific miRNAs implicated in hNSC differentiation. These strategies may be exploited to optimize in vitro hNSC differentiation potential for use in preclinical studies and future clinical applications.
干细胞具有自我更新或分化为多种细胞类型的能力;然而,我们目前对如何控制和利用这种潜能的理解有限。一种新出现的假说认为,微小RNA(miRNA)在控制干细胞命运决定中起核心作用。在此,我们通过使用一种目前正在进行中风残疾临床试验(NCT01151124,Clinicaltrials.gov)测试的细胞系,对miRNA在分化的人神经干细胞(hNSC)中的作用进行了表征。
将hNSC在二维(2D)和三维(3D)培养物中分化1周和3周。通过实时PCR和轴突生长来测量hNSC分化的定量。实施miRNA PCR阵列以研究分化的hNSC中的差异表达谱。通过转染miRNA模拟物、实时PCR、蛋白质免疫印迹和免疫细胞化学来评估miRNA对hNSC的影响。
3D基质促进了hNSC的增强分化,同时细胞增殖减少。分化的hNSC表现出相似的miRNA谱。然而,在3D样本中,miR-17簇、miR-96-182簇和hsa-miR-302a的miRNA成员的调控程度和时间存在显著差异。总体而言,hNSC 3D培养物显示参与hNSC干性、细胞增殖和分化的miRNA存在差异调控。对hsa-miR-146b-5p和hsa-miR-99a的miRNA模拟物分析证实了谱系定向祖细胞的诱导。下调的miRNA更为丰富;选择那些下调最显著的miRNA,并分析其假定的靶mRNA,以阐明其功能。在分化的hNSC中,下调的hsa-miR-96与SOX5基因和蛋白表达的上调相关;hsa-miR-302a、hsa-miR-182、hsa-miR-7、hsa-miR-20a/b和hsa-miR-17及其靶标NR4A3也得到了类似结果。此外,通过荧光素酶报告基因测定,SOX5被鉴定为hsa-miR-96的直接靶基因,NR43A是hsa-miR-7和hsa-mir-17的直接靶标。因此,这些miRNA的调控作用可能通过靶向NR4A3和SOX5发生,这两者均被报道为细胞周期进程和轴突长度的调节剂。
这些结果为鉴定与hNSC分化相关的特定miRNA提供了新的见解。这些策略可用于优化体外hNSC分化潜能,以用于临床前研究和未来的临床应用。