Can Say Esra, Yurdagüven Haktan, Malkondu Özlem, Ünlü Nimet, Soyman Mübin, Kazazoğlu Ender
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, Bağdat Caddesi, No. 238, 34728 Göztepe, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Mar 3;2014:962764. doi: 10.1155/2014/962764. eCollection 2014.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of prophylactic polishing pastes (PPP; Detartrine (DT), Topex (TP)) on surface roughness (R(a)) of indirect composites (IRC; Tescera (TES), Gradia (GRD), and Estenia C&B (EST)), a glass ceramic (Empress 2 layering (E2)), and a leucite reinforced glass ceramic (Empress Esthetic (EE)) with two different (glazed (G); polished (P)) surface preparations. A total of 90 IRC and 120 ceramic discs, 8 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick, were prepared. E2 and EE specimens were randomly divided into two groups (n = 30). One group was glazed (GE2; GEE), while the other group was polished (PE2; PEE) the same as the IRCs. The specimens in each group were subsequently divided into three subgroups: control (C), DT, and TP. R(a) (μm) was evaluated with a profilometer. Data were analyzed by Kruskal Wallis, followed by the Dunn's multiple comparison tests (P < 0.05). DT and TP resulted in significant surface roughening for TES, GRD, and EST, while no significant differences were detected between DT and TP (P > 0.05). PE2 and PEE were not affected by DT or TP (P > 0.05), while GE2 and GEE exhibited significant roughening after TP (P < 0.05). Surface roughness of IRCs and glazed ceramics can be affected by PPP applications.
本研究的目的是评估预防性抛光膏(PPP;去垢灵(DT)、托普克斯(TP))对间接复合材料(IRC;特塞拉(TES)、格拉迪亚(GRD)和埃斯泰尼亚C&B(EST))、一种玻璃陶瓷(帝后2代堆筑体(E2))以及一种白榴石增强玻璃陶瓷(帝后美学(EE))在两种不同表面处理(上釉(G);抛光(P))下的表面粗糙度(R(a))的影响。总共制备了90个IRC圆盘和120个陶瓷圆盘,直径8毫米,厚2毫米。E2和EE样本被随机分为两组(n = 30)。一组进行上釉处理(GE2;GEE),而另一组与IRC一样进行抛光处理(PE2;PEE)。随后,每组样本再分为三个亚组:对照组(C)、DT组和TP组。使用轮廓仪评估R(a)(μm)。数据通过Kruskal Wallis检验进行分析,随后进行邓恩多重比较检验(P < 0.05)。DT和TP导致TES、GRD和EST的表面显著粗糙化,而DT和TP之间未检测到显著差异(P > 0.05)。PE2和PEE不受DT或TP的影响(P > 0.05),而GE2和GEE在使用TP后表现出显著的粗糙化(P < 0.05)。PPP的应用会影响IRC和上釉陶瓷的表面粗糙度。