Kerätär Raija, Taanila Anja, Härkäpää Kristiina, Ala-Mursula Leena
Duodecim. 2014;130(5):495-502.
BACKGROUND. Doctors assess an individual's work ability by comparing the diagnoses and findings to the demands of work. The accuracy of this disease-based orientation has recently been challenged. METHODS. A case study was conducted to compare a disease-based and a multidimensional functioning -based work ability assessment, illustrated through an individual case. RESULTS. Relevant potential for promoting work ability was missed by the disease-based approach, evaluating the entitlement to social security benefits. In the assessment based on multidimensional functioning, dialogue-based plans were made to improve fitness for work. CONCLUSIONS. Multidimensional functioning is recommended as the basis of assessing work ability.
背景。医生通过将诊断结果和检查结果与工作要求进行比较来评估个人的工作能力。这种基于疾病的评估方法的准确性最近受到了挑战。方法。通过一个个案研究,对基于疾病的工作能力评估和基于多维功能的工作能力评估进行比较。结果。基于疾病的方法在评估社会保障福利资格时,遗漏了提升工作能力的相关潜力。在基于多维功能的评估中,制定了基于对话的计划以提高工作适应性。结论。建议将多维功能作为评估工作能力的基础。