Walhovd Kristine B, Fjell Anders M, Espeseth Thomas
Research Group for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Unit of neuropsychology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Scand J Psychol. 2014 Jun;55(3):244-54. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12120. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
Changes in brain structure and activity as well as cognitive function are commonly seen in aging. However, it is not known when aging of brain and cognition starts, and how much of the changes observed in seemingly healthy older adults that can be ascribed to incipient neurodegenerative disease. Recent research has yielded evidence that the borders between development and aging sometimes can be fuzzy, as can the borders between dementing disease and normal age changes. In this review, we argue that many factors affecting cognitive decline and dementia represents quantitative rather than qualitative differences in characteristics that commonly exist in the population. Further, factors known to affect brain and cognition in aging will often do so through a life-long accumulation of impact, and does not need to be specific to aging. And finally, a host of environmental and genetic factors and their interplay determine optimal aging, leaving room for potential for environmental interventions to affect the outcome of the aging process. Together, we argue that these factors call for a dimensional rather than categorical, lifespan rather than aging, and multidimensional systems-vulnerability rather than simple "hypothetical biomarker" model of age-associated cognitive decline and dementia. This has implications for how we should view lifespan trajectories of change in brain and cognitive function, and how we can study, prevent, diagnose and treat age-associated cognitive deficits.
大脑结构与活动以及认知功能的变化在衰老过程中很常见。然而,大脑和认知的衰老何时开始,以及在看似健康的老年人中观察到的变化有多少可归因于早期神经退行性疾病,目前尚不清楚。最近的研究表明,发育与衰老之间的界限有时可能很模糊,痴呆疾病与正常年龄变化之间的界限也是如此。在本综述中,我们认为,影响认知衰退和痴呆的许多因素代表了人群中普遍存在的特征的数量差异而非质量差异。此外,已知影响衰老过程中大脑和认知的因素通常会通过一生的累积影响来发挥作用,并不一定特定于衰老。最后,许多环境和遗传因素及其相互作用决定了最佳衰老状态,这为环境干预影响衰老过程的结果留下了空间。我们共同认为,这些因素要求采用维度而非分类、全生命周期而非衰老、多维系统易损性而非简单的“假设生物标志物”模型来研究与年龄相关的认知衰退和痴呆。这对我们应如何看待大脑和认知功能变化的全生命周期轨迹,以及如何研究、预防、诊断和治疗与年龄相关的认知缺陷具有重要意义。