Kankaanpää Anni T, Putus Tuula M, Tuominen Risto J
Department of Public Health, University of Turku, and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 14;14:168. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-168.
Several studies have shown considerable differences in the way that physicians prescribe sick leave. The aim of this study was to examine the sick leave prescribing practices of occupational health care physicians and factors affecting these practices.
A questionnaire study with 19 hypothetical patient cases was conducted among 356 Finnish occupational health care physicians. The effects of both physician-related and local structural background variables on sick leave prescribing were studied using regression models. Economic consequences of the variation in sick leave prescribing were estimated.
When the cases were considered individually, the variation in prescribed sick leave days was relatively small. However, when considered together, variation in prescribing practice became apparent. On average, the overall number of days of sick leave prescribed for the entire group of 19 patient cases was 85.8, varying between 21 and 170 days. The physicians working at a public health center and those with more than 20 years experience as an occupational health physician tended to prescribe more days of sick leave than others. The quartile of physicians who prescribed the fewest days of sick leave would have resulted in mean production losses (17,100 euro, 95% CI 16,400-17,700) that were half those in the quartile with the most days of sick leave (34,800 euro, 95% CI 33,600-35,900).
There was variation in the sick leave prescribing practices of occupational health care physicians. The most significant factor affecting this variation was the health care sector (public, private or employer clinic) employing the physicians. Variation in sick leave prescribing patterns can lead to inequality between patients.
多项研究表明,医生开具病假条的方式存在显著差异。本研究的目的是调查职业健康护理医生开具病假条的做法以及影响这些做法的因素。
对356名芬兰职业健康护理医生进行了一项包含19个假设患者病例的问卷调查研究。使用回归模型研究了与医生相关的变量和当地结构背景变量对病假条开具的影响。估计了病假条开具差异的经济后果。
单独考虑这些病例时,规定病假天数的差异相对较小。然而,综合考虑时,开具做法的差异就变得明显了。平均而言,为19个患者病例的整个群体开具的病假总天数为85.8天,在21天至170天之间变化。在公共卫生中心工作的医生以及有超过20年职业健康医生经验的医生往往比其他人开具更多天数的病假条。开具病假天数最少的四分之一医生所导致的平均生产损失(17,100欧元,95%可信区间16,400 - 17,700)仅为开具病假天数最多的四分之一医生的一半(34,800欧元,95%可信区间33,600 - 35,900)。
职业健康护理医生开具病假条的做法存在差异。影响这种差异的最主要因素是雇佣这些医生的医疗保健部门(公立、私立或雇主诊所)。病假条开具模式的差异可能导致患者之间的不平等。