Suppr超能文献

用于诊断肝脂肪变性和胰岛素抵抗的肝脏脂肪指数比较。

Comparison of liver fat indices for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance.

作者信息

Kahl Sabine, Straßburger Klaus, Nowotny Bettina, Livingstone Roshan, Klüppelholz Birgit, Keßel Kathrin, Hwang Jong-Hee, Giani Guido, Hoffmann Barbara, Pacini Giovanni, Gastaldelli Amalia, Roden Michael

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center at Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center at Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 14;9(4):e94059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094059. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Hepatic steatosis, defined as increased hepatocellular lipid content (HCL), associates with visceral obesity and glucose intolerance. As exact HCL quantification by 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) is not generally available, various clinical indices are increasingly used to predict steatosis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy of NAFLD liver fat score (NAFLD-LFS), hepatic steatosis index (HSI) and fatty liver index (FLI) against 1H-MRS and their relationships with insulin sensitivity and secretion.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-two non-diabetic, predominantly non-obese humans underwent clinical examination, 1H-MRS and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to calculate insulin sensitivity and β-cell function. Accuracy of indices was assessed from the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC).

RESULTS

Median HCL was 2.49% (0.62;4.23) and correlated with parameters of glycemia across all subjects. NAFLD-LFS, FLI and HSI yielded AROCs of 0.70, 0.72, and 0.79, respectively, and related positively to HCL, insulin resistance, fasting and post-load β-cell function normalized for insulin resistance. Upon adjustment for age, sex and HCL, regression analysis revealed that NAFLD-LFS, FLI and HSI still independently associated with both insulin sensitivity and β-cell function.

CONCLUSION

The tested indices offer modest efficacy to detect steatosis and cannot substitute for fat quantification by 1H-MRS. However, all indices might serve as surrogate parameters for liver fat content and also as rough clinical estimates of abnormal insulin sensitivity and secretion. Further validation in larger collectives such as epidemiological studies is needed.

摘要

背景

肝脂肪变性定义为肝细胞脂质含量(HCL)增加,与内脏肥胖和葡萄糖耐量异常相关。由于一般无法通过1H磁共振波谱法(1H-MRS)精确量化HCL,各种临床指标越来越多地用于预测脂肪变性。

目的

本研究旨在检验非酒精性脂肪性肝病肝脂肪评分(NAFLD-LFS)、肝脂肪变性指数(HSI)和脂肪肝指数(FLI)相对于1H-MRS的准确性及其与胰岛素敏感性和分泌的关系。

设计、地点和参与者:92名非糖尿病、主要是非肥胖的人接受了临床检查、1H-MRS和口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT),以计算胰岛素敏感性和β细胞功能。通过受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AROC)评估指标的准确性。

结果

所有受试者的HCL中位数为2.49%(0.62;4.23),并与血糖参数相关。NAFLD-LFS、FLI和HSI的AROC分别为0.70、0.72和0.79,与HCL、胰岛素抵抗、空腹和负荷后经胰岛素抵抗校正的β细胞功能呈正相关。在调整年龄、性别和HCL后,回归分析显示NAFLD-LFS、FLI和HSI仍与胰岛素敏感性和β细胞功能独立相关。

结论

所测试的指标在检测脂肪变性方面效果一般,不能替代1H-MRS进行脂肪定量。然而,所有指标都可作为肝脏脂肪含量的替代参数,也可作为胰岛素敏感性和分泌异常的粗略临床估计。需要在更大的群体(如流行病学研究)中进行进一步验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b8f/3986069/b25fb95b9012/pone.0094059.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验