• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

0.5%洗必泰口腔去污对机械通气患者定植率和呼吸道感染的影响。初步研究。

The impact of 0.5% chlorhexidine oral decontamination on the prevalence of colonization and respiratory tract infection in mechanically ventilated patients. Preliminary study.

作者信息

Bosca Ileana D, Berar Cristina, Anton F, Mărincean Ana-Maria, Petrisor Cristina, Ionescu Daniela, Hagău Natalia

出版信息

Pneumologia. 2013 Oct-Dec;62(4):217-22.

PMID:24734355
Abstract

AIMS

To determine the effect of Chlorhexidine (CHX) 0.5% oral decontamination on the incidence of colonization/infection of lower respiratory tract in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients.

METHODS

The study was conducted in the multidisciplinary ICU. 30 patients, mechanically ventilated for at least 48 hours, were included. The oral care was performed every 6 hours (6 h CHX group) or 12 hours (12 h CHX group). Tracheal samples were collected every day and the mucosal plaque score (MPS) was also assessed.

RESULTS

The MPS score averages were between 3.8 and 6 in the 6 hours CHX group and between 3.6 and 5 in the 12 hours CHX group. There was no positive association between MPS score and frequency of CHX decontamination (p= 0.898). For 60% of patients in 6 h CHX group and for 40% of patients in 12 h CHX group, colonization did not develop until leaving the study. No significant difference were found between groups with respect to frequency of colonization based on its time of onset (p= 0.523). There is a relationship between the isolation of MRSA and CHX oral decontamination at 12 hours (<phi c =0.392, p=0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

In our preliminary study, no signifficant differences were found between 6 or 12 hour CHX oral decontamination with respect to MPS score and colonization. However, MRSA is vulnerable to 6 hours CHX decontamination. Larger sample size studies are required to determine the efficacy of CHX in the prevention of colonization or respiratory tract infections in mechanically ventilated patients.

摘要

目的

确定0.5%洗必泰(CHX)口腔去污对重症机械通气患者下呼吸道定植/感染发生率的影响。

方法

该研究在多学科重症监护病房进行。纳入30例机械通气至少48小时的患者。每6小时(6小时CHX组)或12小时(12小时CHX组)进行一次口腔护理。每天采集气管样本,并评估黏膜菌斑评分(MPS)。

结果

6小时CHX组的MPS评分平均值在3.8至6之间,12小时CHX组在3.6至5之间。MPS评分与CHX去污频率之间无正相关(p = 0.898)。6小时CHX组60%的患者和12小时CHX组40%的患者在离开研究前未发生定植。基于定植发生时间,两组间定植频率无显著差异(p = 0.523)。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的分离与12小时CHX口腔去污之间存在关联(<phi c = 0.392,p = 0.032)。

结论

在我们的初步研究中,6小时或12小时CHX口腔去污在MPS评分和定植方面未发现显著差异。然而,MRSA对6小时CHX去污敏感。需要更大样本量的研究来确定CHX在预防机械通气患者定植或呼吸道感染方面的疗效。

相似文献

1
The impact of 0.5% chlorhexidine oral decontamination on the prevalence of colonization and respiratory tract infection in mechanically ventilated patients. Preliminary study.0.5%洗必泰口腔去污对机械通气患者定植率和呼吸道感染的影响。初步研究。
Pneumologia. 2013 Oct-Dec;62(4):217-22.
2
Effects of chlorhexidine oral decontamination on respiratory colonization during mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit patients.氯己定口腔去污对重症监护病房机械通气患者呼吸定植的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 May;33(5):527-30. doi: 10.1086/665325. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
3
Oral decontamination with chlorhexidine reduces the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.用氯己定进行口腔去污可降低呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun 15;173(12):1348-55. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200505-820OC. Epub 2006 Apr 7.
4
Decontamination Strategies and Bloodstream Infections With Antibiotic-Resistant Microorganisms in Ventilated Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.通气患者中具有抗生素耐药微生物的去污策略和血流感染:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 27;320(20):2087-2098. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13765.
5
Efficacy of oral chlorhexidine in preventing lower respiratory tract infections. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.口服洗必泰预防下呼吸道感染的疗效。随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2007 Jul;66(3):207-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.03.025. Epub 2007 Jun 1.
6
Effectiveness of oral rinse with chlorhexidine in preventing nosocomial respiratory tract infections among intensive care unit patients.洗必泰口腔含漱预防重症监护病房患者医院获得性呼吸道感染的效果
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;30(10):952-8. doi: 10.1086/605722.
7
[Less ventilator-associated pneumonia after oral decontamination with chlorhexidine; a randomised trial].[洗必泰口腔去污后呼吸机相关性肺炎减少;一项随机试验]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Mar 29;152(13):752-9.
8
Chlorhexidine decreases the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care unit patients: a randomized clinical trial.洗必泰降低 ICU 患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的风险:一项随机临床试验。
J Periodontal Res. 2012 Oct;47(5):584-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2012.01470.x. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
9
Prospective, randomised, controlled study evaluating early modification of oral microbiota following admission to the intensive care unit and oral hygiene with chlorhexidine.前瞻性、随机、对照研究评估入住重症监护病房后口腔微生物群的早期改变和氯己定口腔卫生。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2017 Mar;8:159-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
10
Does an oral care protocol reduce VAP in patients with a tracheostomy?口腔护理方案能否降低气管切开患者的呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生率?
Nursing. 2013 Jul;43(7):18-23. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000428709.81378.7c.