• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与持续使用一款具备拍照及同伴反馈功能的免费饮食自我监测移动应用程序相关的因素:回顾性队列研究

Factors related to sustained use of a free mobile app for dietary self-monitoring with photography and peer feedback: retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Helander Elina, Kaipainen Kirsikka, Korhonen Ilkka, Wansink Brian

机构信息

Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 15;16(4):e109. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3084.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.3084
PMID:24735567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4004142/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthy eating interventions that use behavior change techniques such as self-monitoring and feedback have been associated with stronger effects. Mobile apps can make dietary self-monitoring easy with photography and potentially reach huge populations.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the factors related to sustained use of a free mobile app ("The Eatery") that promotes healthy eating through photographic dietary self-monitoring and peer feedback.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the sample of 189,770 people who had downloaded the app and used it at least once between October 2011 and April 2012. Adherence was defined based on frequency and duration of self-monitoring. People who had taken more than one picture were classified as "Users" and people with one or no pictures as "Dropouts". Users who had taken at least 10 pictures and used the app for at least one week were classified as "Actives", Users with 2-9 pictures as "Semi-actives", and Dropouts with one picture as "Non-actives". The associations between adherence, registration time, dietary preferences, and peer feedback were examined. Changes in healthiness ratings over time were analyzed among Actives.

RESULTS

Overall adherence was low-only 2.58% (4895/189,770) used the app actively. The day of week and time of day the app was initially used was associated with adherence, where 20.28% (5237/25,820) of Users had started using the app during the daytime on weekdays, in comparison to 15.34% (24,718/161,113) of Dropouts. Users with strict diets were more likely to be Active (14.31%, 900/6291) than those who had not defined any diet (3.99%, 742/18,590), said they ate everything (9.47%, 3040/32,090), or reported some other diet (11.85%, 213/1798) (χ(2) 3=826.6, P<.001). The average healthiness rating from peers for the first picture was higher for Active users (0.55) than for Semi-actives (0.52) or Non-actives (0.49) (F2,58167=225.9, P<.001). Actives wrote more often a textual description for the first picture than Semi-actives or Non-actives (χ(2) 2=3515.1, P<.001). Feedback beyond ratings was relatively infrequent: 3.83% (15,247/398,228) of pictures received comments and 15.39% (61,299/398,228) received "likes" from other users. Actives were more likely to have at least one comment or one "like" for their pictures than Semi-actives or Non-actives (χ(2) 2=343.6, P<.001, and χ(2) 2=909.6, P<.001, respectively). Only 9.89% (481/4863) of Active users had a positive trend in their average healthiness ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

Most people who tried out this free mobile app for dietary self-monitoring did not continue using it actively and those who did may already have been healthy eaters. Hence, the societal impact of such apps may remain small if they fail to reach those who would be most in need of dietary changes. Incorporating additional self-regulation techniques such as goal-setting and intention formation into the app could potentially increase user engagement and promote sustained use.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2928/4004142/d39eb68a114f/jmir_v16i4e109_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2928/4004142/ae77aa71173c/jmir_v16i4e109_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2928/4004142/d39eb68a114f/jmir_v16i4e109_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2928/4004142/ae77aa71173c/jmir_v16i4e109_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2928/4004142/d39eb68a114f/jmir_v16i4e109_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

采用自我监测和反馈等行为改变技术的健康饮食干预措施效果更为显著。移动应用程序可通过拍照让饮食自我监测变得轻松,并有潜力覆盖大量人群。

目的

本研究旨在评估与一款免费移动应用程序(“餐厅”)持续使用相关的因素,该应用程序通过饮食拍照自我监测和同伴反馈来促进健康饮食。

方法

对2011年10月至2012年4月期间下载并至少使用过一次该应用程序的189,770人样本进行回顾性分析。根据自我监测的频率和持续时间来定义依从性。拍摄多张照片的人被归类为“使用者”,拍摄一张或未拍摄照片的人被归类为“退出者”。拍摄至少10张照片且使用该应用程序至少一周的使用者被归类为“活跃使用者”,拍摄2 - 9张照片的使用者为“半活跃使用者”,拍摄一张照片的退出者为“非活跃使用者”。研究了依从性、注册时间、饮食偏好和同伴反馈之间的关联。分析了活跃使用者随时间推移健康评分的变化。

结果

总体依从性较低,只有2.58%(4895/189,770)的人积极使用该应用程序。应用程序最初使用的星期几和时间段与依从性相关,其中20.28%(5237/25,820)的使用者在工作日白天开始使用该应用程序,而退出者中这一比例为15.34%(24,718/161,113)。与未定义任何饮食的人(3.99%,742/18,590)、表示什么都吃的人(9.47%,3040/32,090)或报告其他饮食的人(11.85%,213/1798)相比,饮食严格的使用者更有可能成为活跃使用者(14.31%,900/6291)(χ²(3)=826.6,P<.001)。活跃使用者第一张照片获得同伴的平均健康评分(0.55)高于半活跃使用者(0.52)或非活跃使用者(0.49)(F(2,58167)=225.9,P<.001)。活跃使用者为第一张照片撰写文字描述的频率高于半活跃使用者或非活跃使用者(χ²(2)=3515.1,P<.001)。除评分外的反馈相对较少:3.83%(15,247/398,228)的照片收到评论,15.39%(61,299/398,228)的照片收到其他用户的“点赞”。活跃使用者的照片比半活跃使用者或非活跃使用者更有可能至少收到一条评论或一个“赞”(χ²(2)=343.6,P<.001,以及χ²(2)=909.6,P<.001,分别)。只有9.89%(481/4863)的活跃使用者平均健康评分呈上升趋势。

结论

大多数试用这款免费饮食自我监测移动应用程序的人没有继续积极使用它,而那些积极使用的人可能本来就是健康饮食者。因此,如果此类应用程序无法触及最需要改变饮食的人群,其社会影响可能仍然较小。在应用程序中纳入额外的自我调节技术,如目标设定和意图形成,可能会提高用户参与度并促进持续使用。

相似文献

1
Factors related to sustained use of a free mobile app for dietary self-monitoring with photography and peer feedback: retrospective cohort study.与持续使用一款具备拍照及同伴反馈功能的免费饮食自我监测移动应用程序相关的因素:回顾性队列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 15;16(4):e109. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3084.
2
The use of crowdsourcing for dietary self-monitoring: crowdsourced ratings of food pictures are comparable to ratings by trained observers.众包用于饮食自我监测:食物图片的众包评分与训练有素的观察者的评分相当。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Apr;22(e1):e112-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002636. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
3
Association Between User Engagement of a Mobile Health App for Gout and Improvements in Self-Care Behaviors: Randomized Controlled Trial.移动医疗应用程序的痛风用户参与度与自我护理行为改善之间的关联:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 13;7(8):e15021. doi: 10.2196/15021.
4
Adherence to self-monitoring healthy lifestyle behaviours through mobile phone-based ecological momentary assessments and photographic food records over 6 months in mostly ethnic minority mothers.6 个月内,通过基于手机的生态瞬时评估和拍照食物记录,主要在少数民族母亲中,坚持自我监测健康生活方式行为。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Mar;21(4):679-688. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003044. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
5
Dietary Self-Monitoring Through Calorie Tracking but Not Through a Digital Photography App Is Associated with Significant Weight Loss: The 2SMART Pilot Study-A 6-Month Randomized Trial.通过卡路里追踪进行饮食自我监测,但不通过数码拍照应用进行监测,与显著体重减轻相关:2SMART 试验的初步研究——一项为期 6 个月的随机试验。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Sep;119(9):1525-1532. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 May 30.
6
Adults' Preferences for Behavior Change Techniques and Engagement Features in a Mobile App to Promote 24-Hour Movement Behaviors: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.成年人对促进 24 小时运动行为的移动应用程序中行为改变技术和参与功能的偏好:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Dec 20;7(12):e15707. doi: 10.2196/15707.
7
Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Few Evidence-Based Features of Dietary Interventions Included in Photo Diet Tracking Mobile Apps for Weight Loss.一张图片胜过千言万语?用于减肥的照片饮食追踪移动应用程序中包含的饮食干预措施的循证特征寥寥无几。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Nov 1;10(6):1399-1405. doi: 10.1177/1932296816651451. Print 2016 Nov.
8
An App to Improve Eating Habits of Adolescents and Young Adults (Challenge to Go): Systematic Development of a Theory-Based and Target Group-Adapted Mobile App Intervention.一款改善青少年和青年饮食习惯的应用程序(挑战前行):基于理论和目标群体适应性的移动应用程序干预的系统开发。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 12;7(8):e11575. doi: 10.2196/11575.
9
Effectiveness of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted App for Improving Eating Behaviors: Mixed Methods Evaluation.人工智能辅助应用程序改善饮食行为的有效性:混合方法评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 7;26:e46036. doi: 10.2196/46036.
10
The Association Between App-Administered Depression Assessments and Suicidal Ideation in User Comments: Retrospective Observational Study.应用程序管理的抑郁评估与用户评论中自杀意念的关联:回顾性观察研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 4;8(8):e18392. doi: 10.2196/18392.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Inequalities in Mobile Health Utilization Across Phases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.了解移动健康在各阶段使用中的不平等现象:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e71349. doi: 10.2196/71349.
2
Effectiveness of recommendations in promoting the use of mobile health applications in health guidance: a randomized controlled trial.健康指导中促进移动健康应用程序使用的建议的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Occup Health. 2025 Jan 7;67(1). doi: 10.1093/joccuh/uiaf036.
3
When and Why Adults Abandon Lifestyle Behavior and Mental Health Mobile Apps: Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Weekly patterns, diet quality and energy balance.每周模式、饮食质量与能量平衡。
Physiol Behav. 2014 Jul;134:55-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.02.046. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
2
Collection and visualization of dietary behavior and reasons for eating using Twitter.利用推特收集和呈现饮食行为及饮食原因
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jun 24;15(6):e125. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2613.
3
New technology in dietary assessment: a review of digital methods in improving food record accuracy.膳食评估新技术:综述改善食物记录准确性的数字化方法。
成年人何时以及为何放弃生活方式行为和心理健康移动应用程序:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 18;26:e56897. doi: 10.2196/56897.
4
Factors influencing the continuance intention of the women's health WeChat public account: an integrated model of UTAUT2 and HBM.影响女性健康微信公众号持续使用意愿的因素:UTAUT2 和 HBM 的综合模型。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 20;12:1348673. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348673. eCollection 2024.
5
Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare: An Overview of the Applications of Digital Technologies in Diet Management.数字抗衰保健:数字技术在饮食管理中的应用概述
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 27;14(3):254. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030254.
6
A Pilot Feasibility Evaluation of a Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback App to Improve Self-Care in COVID-19 Healthcare Workers.心率变异性生物反馈应用程序改善 COVID-19 医护人员自我护理的可行性初步评估。
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2024 Jun;49(2):241-259. doi: 10.1007/s10484-024-09621-w.
7
A framework for integrating artificial intelligence for clinical care with continuous therapeutic monitoring.一个将用于临床护理的人工智能与持续治疗监测相结合的框架。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2025 Apr;9(4):445-454. doi: 10.1038/s41551-023-01115-0. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
8
Can mobile-health applications contribute to long-term increase in physical activity after medical rehabilitation?-A pilot-study.移动健康应用程序能否助力医学康复后身体活动的长期增加?一项试点研究。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Oct 16;2(10):e0000359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000359. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Mobile Phone-Based Interventions for Smoking Cessation Among Young People: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于手机的干预措施在青少年戒烟中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Sep 12;11:e48253. doi: 10.2196/48253.
10
Incorporating Consumers' Needs in Nutrition Apps to Promote and Maintain Use: Mixed Methods Study.将消费者的需求纳入营养应用程序中以促进和维持使用:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Jun 20;11:e39515. doi: 10.2196/39515.
Proc Nutr Soc. 2013 Feb;72(1):70-6. doi: 10.1017/S0029665112002911.
4
Website usage and weight loss in a free commercial online weight loss program: retrospective cohort study.一项免费商业在线减肥项目中的网站使用情况与体重减轻:回顾性队列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jan 15;15(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2195.
5
Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions.劝导性系统设计至关重要:对基于网络干预措施依从性的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 14;14(6):e152. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2104.
6
Comparison of known food weights with image-based portion-size automated estimation and adolescents' self-reported portion size.已知食物重量与基于图像的份量自动估计以及青少年自我报告的份量之间的比较。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Mar 1;6(2):428-34. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600231.
7
Novel technologies for assessing dietary intake: evaluating the usability of a mobile telephone food record among adults and adolescents.评估饮食摄入量的新技术:评估成人和青少年使用手机记录食物的可行性。
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Apr 13;14(2):e58. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1967.
8
Healthcare in the pocket: mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions.口袋里的医疗保健:手机健康干预措施的空间映射。
J Biomed Inform. 2012 Feb;45(1):184-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.08.017. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
9
Online interventions for social marketing health behavior change campaigns: a meta-analysis of psychological architectures and adherence factors.社交营销健康行为改变活动的在线干预措施:心理架构与依从因素的荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Feb 14;13(1):e17. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1367.
10
Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review.哪些干预特征与更多接触互联网提供的健康生活方式促进干预措施有关?一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 6;13(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1639.