• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫症患者中明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版(MMPI-2)临床量表与明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版-重组版(MMPI-2-RF)重构临床(RC)量表之间的分数差异。

Elevation discrepancies between MMPI-2 clinical and MMPI-2-RF restructured clinical (RC) scales in people with seizure disorders.

作者信息

Bowden Stephen C, White Jessica R, Simpson Leonie, Ben-Porath Yossef S

机构信息

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, Redmond Barry Building, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia; Neuropsychology Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, St. Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia.

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, Redmond Barry Building, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2014 May;34:92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.03.016. Epub 2014 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.03.016
PMID:24735833
Abstract

PURPOSE

People with seizure disorders experience elevated rates of psychopathology, often undiagnosed and untreated. Accurate diagnosis of psychopathology remains an important goal of quality health care for people with seizure disorders. One of the most widely used dimensional measures of psychopathology is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Second Edition (MMPI-2). Research in heterogeneous mental health samples suggests that the 2008 revision of this measure, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Second Edition-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF), offers better construct fidelity and more cost-effective administration. This study seeks to extend research on MMPI-2-RF scale elevations to a sample of people with seizure disorders.

METHODS

In a consecutive, heterogeneous sample of people with seizure disorders, MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF scores were compared in terms of categorical classification agreement (clinically elevated versus not clinically elevated). Scores were also compared in terms of variance attributable to diagnosis-specific items, general demoralization, subtle items, social desirability, and demographic factors.

KEY FINDINGS

Scores on MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF provided a statistically significant level of agreement between corresponding clinical diagnostic scales ranging from 68% to 84%. Most classification disagreement was attributable to MMPI-2 clinical scale elevations when MMPI-2-RF scales were not elevated. Regression analysis supported the interpretation that general demoralization, subtle items, social desirability, and demographic factors led to MMPI-2 clinical scale elevations.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results provide evidence that in the context of strong psychopathology classification agreement, the MMPI-2-RF restructured clinical scales provide better construct fidelity compared with the more trait heterogeneous MMPI-2 clinical scales. These results should encourage clinicians to use the MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) for improved psychopathology assessment compared with the MMPI-2 in patients with seizure disorders.

摘要

目的

癫痫症患者出现精神病理学症状的比例较高,且这些症状往往未得到诊断和治疗。准确诊断精神病理学症状仍然是癫痫症患者高质量医疗保健的一个重要目标。精神病理学最广泛使用的维度测量方法之一是明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版(MMPI-2)。对异质性心理健康样本的研究表明,该量表在2008年的修订版,即明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版重组版(MMPI-2-RF),具有更好的结构效度和更高的管理成本效益。本研究旨在将对MMPI-2-RF量表升高情况的研究扩展到癫痫症患者样本。

方法

在一个连续的、异质性的癫痫症患者样本中,比较了MMPI-2和MMPI-2-RF在分类一致性(临床升高与非临床升高)方面的得分。还比较了得分在归因于特定诊断项目、总体士气低落、细微项目、社会期望和人口统计学因素方面的差异。

主要发现

MMPI-2和MMPI-2-RF的得分在相应临床诊断量表之间提供了具有统计学意义的一致性水平,范围从68%到84%。当MMPI-2-RF量表未升高时,大多数分类不一致归因于MMPI-2临床量表升高。回归分析支持这样的解释,即总体士气低落、细微项目、社会期望和人口统计学因素导致了MMPI-2临床量表升高。

意义

结果提供了证据,表明在精神病理学分类一致性较强的情况下,与特质异质性更强的MMPI-2临床量表相比,MMPI-2-RF重组临床量表具有更好的结构效度。这些结果应鼓励临床医生在癫痫症患者中使用MMPI-2重组版(MMPI-2-RF),以比MMPI-2更好地评估精神病理学症状。

相似文献

1
Elevation discrepancies between MMPI-2 clinical and MMPI-2-RF restructured clinical (RC) scales in people with seizure disorders.癫痫症患者中明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版(MMPI-2)临床量表与明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版-重组版(MMPI-2-RF)重构临床(RC)量表之间的分数差异。
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 May;34:92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.03.016. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
2
Elevation differences between MMPI-2 clinical and restructured clinical (RC) scales: frequency, origins, and interpretative implications.明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版(MMPI-2)临床量表与重构临床(RC)量表之间的分数差异:频率、来源及解释意义
Assessment. 2006 Dec;13(4):430-41. doi: 10.1177/1073191106293349.
3
Comparisons between the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent-Restructured Form (MMPI-A RF) and MMPI-A in adolescent psychiatric inpatients.明尼苏达多相人格测验-青少年修订版(MMPI-A RF)与 MMPI-A 在青少年精神科住院患者中的比较。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Mar;30(3):370-382. doi: 10.1037/pas0000488. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
4
An Introduction to the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent-Restructured Form (MMPI-A-RF).明尼苏达多相人格问卷青少年修订版(MMPI-A-RF)简介。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2016 Dec;23(4):361-373. doi: 10.1007/s10880-016-9475-6.
5
The comparative capacity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales to detect suspected malingering in a disability claimant sample.明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版(MMPI - 2)和明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版重构版(MMPI - 2 - RF)效度量表在检测残疾索赔人样本中疑似诈病情况时的比较能力。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Feb;29(2):199-208. doi: 10.1037/pas0000328. Epub 2016 May 16.
6
Detection of overreported psychopathology with the MMPI-2-RF [corrected] validity scales.使用 MMPI-2-RF [更正] 效度量表检测过度报告的精神病理学。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Dec;22(4):757-67. doi: 10.1037/a0020825.
7
Utility of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) validity scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: a known-groups design.MMPI-2-RF(重构形式)效度量表在刑事法医鉴定中检测伪装的效用:一个已知群体设计。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Mar;22(1):22-31. doi: 10.1037/a0018222.
8
Examining the impact of unscorable item responses on the validity and interpretability of MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF Restructured Clinical (RC) Scale scores.考察无法评分项目反应对 MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF 重构临床(RC)量表分数的效度和可解释性的影响。
Assessment. 2012 Mar;19(1):101-13. doi: 10.1177/1073191111415362. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
9
Further Examining the Construct Validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) Personality Disorder Spectra Scales.进一步考察明尼苏达多相人格测验-2 修订本(MMPI-2-RF)人格障碍谱系量表的结构效度。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Jul-Aug;103(4):443-454. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1828434. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
10
Associations between MMPI-2-RF validity scale scores and extra-test measures of personality and psychopathology.MMPI-2-RF 效度量表得分与人格和精神病理学的额外测试测量之间的关联。
Assessment. 2013 Aug;20(4):448-61. doi: 10.1177/1073191113478154. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Construct Validity of the PHQ-9 Depression Screen: Correlations with Substantive Scales of the MMPI-2-RF.PHQ-9 抑郁筛查的建构效度:与 MMPI-2-RF 的实质性量表的相关性。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2020 Mar;27(1):150-157. doi: 10.1007/s10880-019-09629-z.